|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 03:29 PM Original message |
The TED Talk debate between Mark Jacobson and Stewart Brand is up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. I love TED talks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. About f'ing time. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. Excellent, thx!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-12-10 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Brand picked the wrong thing to critique of Jacobson's flawed analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Jacobson's analysis is reality based, Brand has fallen for industry hype and PR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yes, you're right, I should not have given Brand the benefit of the doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Jacobson's analysis is solid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 01:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. The statements I made are fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. No, the statements you made aren't "fact". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Areva is not representitive of all nuclear power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Sure they will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. We'll see, won't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 05:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Do you have links for those CEO quotes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Financial Analysts Reject Merchant Nuclear as a Viable Business Model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. All about business for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 02:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. That post follows the ongoing conversation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Yet, as the two MIT studies show, such "projections" are not set in stone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-16-10 06:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. The outlook improved between the two papers. Fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. There is no evidence to support the nuclear industry claims - period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-14-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Show me peer reviewed papers, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-15-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. You are being dishonest, your sources were not posted in a peer reviewed paper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-13-10 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
6. Kick and recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC