Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KS Sunflower Coal Plant "Cleanest In The Nation"; At Least 669 Others Have Lower Particlulate Output

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 01:49 PM
Original message
KS Sunflower Coal Plant "Cleanest In The Nation"; At Least 669 Others Have Lower Particlulate Output
EDIT

At a news conference in December, Mitchell described the plant’s technology to control emissions as “state of the art.” Mitchell also said he “will be very surprised if (EPA officials) have any problem with what we have done.”

But last week, the Environmental Protection Agency sent the agency a letter questioning two of the proposed emission levels granted by the permit and whether they violate the Clean Air Act. The new analysis compared emissions of four pollutants from the almost 700 coal-fired generating units in the country with the emission levels listed in the Sunflower permit. The report found that the Sunflower permit did not compare well in two areas:

•At least 669 coal-fired generating units have lower emissions of particulate matter than the current Sunflower permit allows.

•At least 321 coal-fired generating units have lower emissions of mercury than the Sunflower permit allows.

The permit compared better in two other areas, but the EPA is questioning whether the permit is adhering to new federal rules on those. According to the report:

•At least 53 coal-fired generating units have lower emissions of sulfur dioxide than the Sunflower permit allows.

•At least 18 coal-fired generating units have lower emissions of nitrogen oxides than the Sunflower permit allows.

EDIT

http://www.kansascity.com/2011/02/09/2644900/power-plants-promises-come-up.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oops! did we say "cleanest"???
We meant "most profitable". Sorry for the mis-statement...:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC