|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:40 AM Original message |
TEPCO Confirms Reactor 4 Spent Fuel Pool Is Now An Uncontrolled, Open Air Fission Process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. Not good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yes, it's hard to keep up with Tepco when they also said things are dandy in No. 4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That fact that you're confused does not equal them "creating confusion". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. There are contradictory reports about No. 4, have been for a while nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. Thanks, I think... for the update.....even if tentative still. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I'd like to know the readings near No. 4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "they take their readings driving by in a car" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yes, the readings for near the plants are done from a care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. That high? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. Lol... just as predicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Nuclear fission is what is reported by the Japanese News Agency Kyodo News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. No... it most certainly wasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Combined with the extremely high readings from poool 4 and they seem to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Those aren't "extremely high readings" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Commenton the zh thread re: proof vs. evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. My comments on the comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yes, these arguments are pretty speculative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 01:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Did you by any chance see the video of pool #4 released over the weekend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. 40 to 90 CELCIUS is a big change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-14-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. We don't know how much pumping they've done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-15-11 01:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Those are fission products |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. It would have other, VERY short-lived isotopes present as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
22. Why don't we just go ahead and blow the world up while we're at it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. nuclear turkeys! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC