|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:58 AM Original message |
What Feed-in Tariffs Could Do for Japan's Electricity Shortage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. How many TWh of solar did Germany create last year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Fron the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. That's 80 TWh over ten years. Not 80 TWh per year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 04:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. How do you derive that this is 80TWh over ten years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 05:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Basic reading comprehension... and a little prior knowledge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The number for Fukushima seems a bit high as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Of course, 2 or 3 of the reactors at Fukushima were offline for at least part of 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 07:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. The numbers are compatible with Japan's fleet capacity factor I believe. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Not the point of the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Of course it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 03:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. This thread is a perfect example of you disrupting discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. You're not "butting in" are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. A related discussion by Gipe on German renewable and nuclear energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 03:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. "The country also reached a renewable energy electricity penetration of more than 30% on Feb 7th" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. There is no "variable-source" point to be made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. 30% down to 18% in the same day sure seems variable to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Why do you keep pushing rightwing coal/nuclear industry memes on a progressive site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Why do you keep dishonestly referring to anyone who disagrees with you as RW? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. You are pushing a proven false rightwing coal/nuclear industry meme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Asked and answered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 07:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. You are using a false right wing argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. If only a double negative was actually a rebuttal in real life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One_Life_To_Give (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
23. SHort term they need inverters to supply power from the southern grid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC