|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:49 PM Original message |
EPA data shows Fukushima Uranium in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. Do you know what the prefix "nano" means? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I don't think it's nano in Japan, and we've learned it's lie after lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Depleted uranium? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Here is a discussion about uranium in CA water on the Berkeley site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 05:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Wow... that's an entertaining chain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 01:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. If It's "nano" in California, It is probably "mega" or "terra" in Japan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 05:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. If you're an immoral, reprehensible shill for the nuke industry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:22 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. No need to pretend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 09:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. If the Japanese Government Would Release Data on U and Pu, We Wouldn't Have to Guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 06:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Must be nice to be a mutant life-form, thriving on toxins and radioactivity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:19 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. So I take it that your answer was "no" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. "...so we can all have a laugh at your expense." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:43 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Is it the facts or the arithmetic that's causing you the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 09:02 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Yes. YOUR facts, YOUR arithmetic. On every subject relating to radiation and toxic waste. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 09:05 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Still dodging? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Attacking DUers for their value judgments? Your trust in the fission industry is noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Nope. Neither "attacking" nor doing so for "value judgements" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. You are harassing and hectoring DUers for their values. Stop it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:17 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I'm doing neither. I'm correcting misinformation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. It is exactly what you are doing. If others do not trust the nuclear industry, you badger them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Can't go a day without spamming the board, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. "attitudes and risk perceptions are a function of values" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Facts, however, are NOT a function of "values" or perceptions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. You are badgering and hectoring people about their risk perceptions, ergo, their values. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. "Risk perception" and "values" are NOT synonyms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. The paper is clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. As well as clearly wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 09:17 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. contamination is fun!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Is the entire ocean contaminated when one drop of oil is spilled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Is everyone supposed to trust the nuclear industry like you do? Is that your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:19 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. The EPA is the nuclear industry now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
27. How does the Happy Talk Memo deny away the trend of U concentrations and distance from Fukushima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. The "trend" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Happy Happy Talk Talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I'd bet dollars to donuts that the difference in activity between your home and the one next door |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. So you are saying that there are no uranium aerosols being released from Fukushima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Nope. I've said no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. If I haven't said it before (or recently), thank you, so very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
25. K&R - uranium releases - not good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. And like everything else the alarmist have spoken about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC