Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg Will Boldly Push To Eliminate NYC Dirtiest Fuel Oil Use By . . . 2030

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 12:13 PM
Original message
Bloomberg Will Boldly Push To Eliminate NYC Dirtiest Fuel Oil Use By . . . 2030
All New York City buildings must stop using the nastiest types of fuel oil by 2030, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Thursday.

One percent of the buildings in the Big Apple create 86 percent of the city’s soot pollution – more than all vehicles on the road - because they burn an out-dated low quality fuel (known as No. 6 and No. 4 heating oil), the mayor said. The polluting buildings, said the mayor, include “200 public schools,” which the city will convert to cleaner fuels.

The new regulations, “will do more than congestion pricing” to clean up the air, the mayor said, referring to his rejected proposal to charge drivers entering Manhattan.

But Bloomberg appeared to still have hope for resurrecting congestion pricing, which was squashed by Albany politicians fearful of the wrath of outer-borough voters. “The problems persist and we still have to do something about it,” he said. Bloomberg’s Earth Day Eve speech was in conjunction with his annual progress report on “PlaNYC,” a project aimed at preparing the city for a million new residents, ameliorating climate change and improve quality of life while fortifying the economy.

EDIT

http://www.amny.com/urbanite-1.812039/bloomberg-city-will-eliminate-dirty-fuel-oils-by-2030-1.2831770
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. We should be able to meet somewhere in the middle
On the one hand we've got some who think we can get to 100% renewables by 2030

On the other we've got those who think we can't even get rid of fuel oil by that point?

Is there not something reasonably in between that is possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not if you're the mayor of New York, apparently
I mean, yeah, it's HVAC, it's potentially a lot of money, but . . nineteen years?

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I bet he expects to close many of those schools by then.
Yes... 19 years seems excessive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC