Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From The "Just In Time" Folder - Daimler, GM Will Jointly Develop Hybrids

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:25 PM
Original message
From The "Just In Time" Folder - Daimler, GM Will Jointly Develop Hybrids
Edited on Fri Aug-26-05 12:44 PM by hatrack
And of course, they're developing hybrid versions of the Yukon, Durango and Tahoe - :wtf:

DETROIT -- General Motors Corp. and DaimlerChrysler AG confirmed Thursday they will jointly develop fuel-saving hybrid engines in hopes of cashing in on an expanding market now dominated by Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co.

Under the agreement announced in December and formalized Monday, GM will be the lead designer of hybrid engines for full-size trucks and sport-utility vehicles, and front-wheel-drive cars and crossover vehicles. DaimlerChrysler will be the lead designer of hybrid engines for rear-wheel-drive luxury cars.

The Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon will be the first GM vehicles powered by the newly developed hybrids, Tom Stephens, GM's group vice president for powertrains, said. DaimlerChrysler will debut with a hybrid-powered Dodge Durango SUV, he said.

The Tahoe and Yukon hybrids are scheduled to be introduced in 2007, when Toyota has said it hopes sales of its hybrid models will total several hundred thousand worldwide.

EDIT

http://www.startribune.com/stories/535/5579849.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pauldavid Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too little, too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. "We are now playing that most American of games... catch-up!"
(that dude played by Sean Connery in "Rising Sun")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. developing? the hybrids are here, so grow up, a-holes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catbird Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Missing the point
Wow! More efficient SUVs. I can hardly wait. I suppose there's nothing wrong with this, but what we need is more fuel efficient cars and fewer SUVs. Actually, what we need is better mass transit, but maybe that's too much to hope for at this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Use of busses is on the rise.
At least it is in phoenix. I would assume the same for other urban environments.

Busses are probably an excellent near-term solution. They can be deployed rapidly, without the requirement of giant municiple engineering projects like building light-rail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. GM has a different plan
They want to utilize hybrid technology in mid-size and larger cars and trucks, as opposed to making hybrids out of Aveos. Hell, they had the Metro back in the '90's. Remember that one? It got up into the 50's for fuel economy.

Hybrid technology is great, but much of it is smoke and mirrors. The Prius has a pretty small motor in it and it is a fairly small vehicle. Without the hybrid stuff, it would get up into at least the 40's anyway, especially when you remove those heavy battery packs. The Prius, underneath it all, is a science experiment version of a Geo Metro with a $23K price tag. Look at the new Accord and Civic hybrids. They gain roughly 10 MPG over their straight fuel counterparts.

Most people here shit all over the big three, especially GM. Remember, they did take a chance with electric technology back in the '90's. And the big three are also heavy proponents of flex-fuel capabilities (Ethanol-85 compatible, meaning that these vehicles can run on a fuel which is much cleaner burning than regular gasoline). Flex-fuel vehicles are more widely available and cheaper than hybrid technology. There are already millions of vehicles on the road that can accept fuel containing up to 85% ethanol (aka E85).

Oh, and did you know that GM makes a lot of cars, from small to large, that get pretty decent fuel economy? For instance, both the Malibu and Impala from Chevy can reach over 30 MPG on the highway. And the Corvette with that big 6.0 V8 can easily hit the mid-upper 20's on the highway.

And I don't blame GM, Ford, or DaimlerChrysler for making large numbers of trucks. These are some pretty broad lines, and they wouldn't make them if people weren't buying them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. But I thought GM and DC said hydrogen was the fuel of the future?
Maybe they finally realized the error of their ways. But still, as others have said, too little too late, and the wrong damn models.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, I mean seriously!
A Durango that gets 15 MPG instead of 13 and costs $3,000 more than its standard counterpart? Day late, dollar short, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good god, THAT's their answer to Toyota?
Somebody put them out of their misery. It's too pathetic to behold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. There are two types of hybrids
One is the type that we are all familiar with. The kind like the Honda Insight or Toyota Prius that is built with fuel economy in mind. Expect to see fuel economy increase about 10 MPG.

The other type is a hybrid setup that is designed more to increase performance or to use for other purposes. GM obviously doesn't boast about the 10% fuel increase in Silverado hybrids. But it isn't really designed for that. It's more for electrical functionality, and to provide an electrical source for commercial applications (construction crews, for example). This is not designed to be a pickup that gets 50 MPG plus.

Keep in mind, this modern hybrid technology is still in it's infancy. Alternative fuel is still in it's infancy. Nothing is going to happen overnight.

I know GM's strategy is not to come out with a Prius/Insight fighter, but rather to adapt everyday vehicles that everyone drives to hybrid (expect to see a Chevy Malibu hybrid in the next year or two). Personally, I think they should just bit the bullet, put out a glorified golf cart like the Prius that gets a ton of hype, and get everyone off their backs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Fuel cells?
I made my first battery for a Boy Scout merit badge 50 years ago, and another one a few months later in my "Vo-Tech" electric shop class, and I made my first fuel cell as an extra credit project in Phys Chem Lab II just over 40 years ago -- and I did a due diligence technology study of a fuel cell based co-gen/distributed gen stock offering.

There is no way they are going to get a viable, cost effective, personally owned vehicle, mobile, fuel cell system within twenty years.

My Gosh - the fuel cells just moved from graphite to platinized platinum black and BET surface areas - give them time to intellectually absorb work functions and band gaps, and valence bands, and conduction bands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Silver lining...

The silver lining is in the hacks.

A pickup can carry a buttload of extra batteries, at least :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why can't they just bring their European diesels over here? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Sulfur, that's why.

U.S. deisel is dirty by comparison. That'll change in a few years as new standards come into effect. Betcha we hear about a Toyota deisel hybrid being test-marketed within the next year. Once they can make a PZEV deisel without sinking tons of money into the emissions system, they will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Take The VW 61HP TDI Engine Used In The Lupo
which is designed for frequent on/off cycling, couple it with the Toyota Prius hybrid technology (CVT, etc.), all in a Jetta/Focus/Prius form factor, and you would have a 80 mpg (h) car that would sell itself. Add 20 mi. PHEV electric only range, a 120+ mpge car.

Any passenger vehicle on the drawing board today that will not attain 60 mpg (h) or better may as well be scrapped.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. But as a result of their lawsuits in the early 1990's
(to protect their GM EV1 "monopoly", keep the RAV 4 EV and Insite and Prius off of the market) GM has the right to clone Prius technology "marketed in the US" between certain dates -- kind of like the Matrix-Vibe and Prizm-Corolla situation.

They already showed a flavor of the Precept with a diesel hybrid plant.

Being a cynical ex-Detroiter - I think this is a charade to get their junk bond rating upgraded to investment grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Totally ridiculous
I own an Olds Alero V6 and plan to get either a Prius or a Corolla. I used to have a '91 Corolla and it was a great car. Now they're even more luxurious with the same or better gas mileage. The Alero gets around 22mpg around town (I drive slow&gentle) and around 28-29 MPG freeway. The annoying thing is it "only" has 14 gallon tank so the range sucks. An 18 gallon tank would've been better, but when I drive 150 miles to grandma's house on I-10 I still have well over 1/2 a tank.

I'm looking forward to getting either a Corolla LE or S model. The thing that makes me pause on the Prius is what kind of warranty is on the battery pack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Warranty on Prius
"The thing that makes me pause on the Prius is what kind of warranty is on the battery pack."

150,000 miles - even if the DETROIT News or Detroit Free Press or the salesman at Conyers Ford in Dearbon, MI says differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. And every other hybrid part has a 8 year / 100,000 mile warranty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC