http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20110805/NEWS01/108050316/Juno-craft-target-launch-atop-Atlas-V-from-Cape-Canaveral-today…
"I think it just goes to show you that they needlessly put people and the planet in grave danger during past plutonium launches," Gagnon said in an email.
"It surely shows that our claims they could use solar in deep space were not wrong as NASA claimed during the Galileo, Ulysses and Cassini launches."
Solar power spacecraft in the past always have been deemed unsuitable for outer planet exploration.
Jupiter is five times farther from the sun than Earth, so the gas giant receives 25 percent less sunlight.
…
(Not even close… well… to be fair, they got the 5×5=25 part right.)
For those who don’t remember their high school physics, by the “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law#Light_and_other_electromagnetic_radiation">Inverse Square Law” Jupiter (5 times as far away from the Sun as Earth) would receive 1/5
2th (1/25th) as intense sunlight (or,
96 “percent less sunlight.”)
I saw this same blunder in our local Gannett paper, suggesting that this was Gannett’s error.
How many times was this reviewed without someone saying, “Hmmm… something doesn’t seem right…”