BushCo threw almost a Billion Dollars at fuel cell companies yet a fool cell big enough to run a car is still over $50,000.
How many fool cell cars have been purchased by someone... anyone... ZERO. They are too expensive and very few are made... and those are strictly LEASED, never sold. Fuel cell durability (being damaged by air pollution, wear and tear) is still pitiful.
For lift trucks (fork lifts) fool cells may be an ok solution because they never go outside the warehouse where the refueling station is. But if you're replacing your lift trucks/fork lifts with new models why not just choose ones with Lithium-Ion batteries. It'll take about 3 more years for the fool cell fork lifts to prove their reliability (or lack thereof). I think I know what companies who switched to fool cell lift trucks will be saying.
Refs:
the great hydrogen swindleThe Reality of Hydrogen , The problem with hydrogen is that nobody is telling it how it really is , too many vested interests!
this top gear segment is the latest in a long line of greenwash designed to fool us all into thinking hydrogen is actually a green fuel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5thFx4hqFQ&feature=relatedEVS23: Fuel Cell or Fool-Sell, Hydrogen Hype Tape 4 Fuel cells require Hydrogen, which has a much lower energy density than CNG at low pressures. Hydrogen is perhaps the most difficult gas to deal with, as it infiltrates most metals leading to the "embrittement" problem.
But that's not the worst problem for fuel cells.
You have to make the Hydrogen, which takes more energy than you get out of it. The fuel cell, in practice, is only about twice as efficient as an Internal Combustion ("IC") engine, so it takes a lot more energy to run a fool sell car than an EV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY_nrZIuaSc======================================================================
================== Don't be fooled by FOOL CELLS =====================
======================================================================