Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

King coal is back

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 08:37 PM
Original message
King coal is back
From High Country News: Dec 22 2003


King coal is back
by Tim Westby

With natural gas supplies stretched thin, and the Bush administration loosening environmental regulations, energy companies are turning their attention back to coal

(snip)

Until earlier this year, the last time a coal plant of any significant size came on line in the West was 1984, but thanks to the rising cost of natural gas and the looser regulatory environment in Washington, D.C., coal is suddenly hot again. Upwards of 40 proposals are now on the table for new or expanded coal-fired plants, from eastern Montana to central Arizona.

All of this is re-igniting antagonism between environmentalists and the utility and mining industries. Environmentalists argue that the push for coal is little more than a knee-jerk reaction to a looming gas shortage. But utilities say the West’s vast coal reserves make coal the best and least-expensive way to meet the region’s growing demand for power.

(snip)


But the Sigurd coal plant, and others like it, just got a boost from former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt. His first major policy decision as the new director of the federal Environmental Protection Agency was to propose loosening the restrictions on mercury and nickel emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants.



More: http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=14458
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oggy Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Peak Oil
again, IMO. The return to the previous generation of fuel. Coal is much worse for Global Warming, so this will exacerbate the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbsolutMauser Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Coal's time has passed...
We need to promote nuclear energy. Continued reliance on dirty power sources that produce little energy per mass of fuel is going to cause us too many problems. I'd also like to see increased research funding for fusion research, though that's still pretty far off.

Coal mining and burning cause too much damage to be our primary energy source in the coming centuries. We aren't going to run out of it anytime soon, but as our energy demands grow, the air will get nastier and mining operations will get larger.

Go nukes!

~AbM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC