jpak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 02:10 PM
Original message |
The Dammed: (Three Gorges Dam - China) |
|
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article351717.eceThe world's biggest dam is to open in May, months ahead of schedule. The Three Gorges dam is viewed by supporters with pride as a symbol of China's economic and social change but environmentalists believe it is a catastrophe waiting to happen. <more>
|
Psephos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Comparable to old Soviet-style environmental disregard |
|
Short-term economic benefit trumps everything else in a government which has no checks on its decisions, and an ambitious nationalist agenda to fund.
Peace.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. this dam is a marvel of engineering |
|
and i`m sure it hold water for thousands of year but yes, but at what cost...
|
phantom power
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. How long it lasts depends on silt load of the river. |
|
If the silt load is high, the reservoir might last a surprisingly short time. For instance, the Powell Reservoir has already lost 20% of it's original volume to silt from the Colorado. The reservoir is only about 45 years old.
I don't know how the Yangtze's silt load compares. The reservoir itself is larger.
Epic silt-avalanches lie some time in the future, when the dams eventually fail.
|
phantom power
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Discovery channel had a program on the archaeological loss. |
|
The archaeologists have been digging 24/7 just to get stuff out of the ground before it's flooded. They catalog the location, position, etc, and ship it all to warehouses. Whatever they save, they'll sift through later once everything is drowned. They figure they might save 10% of what was there. Maybe less.
To say nothing of the environmental destruction. It must be the largest single riparian habitat loss in history.
|
blindpig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Say goodbye to the endemic dolphin and alligator. n/t |
Dead_Parrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
On the plus side, it's down to produce 10% of china's electricity (220TWh, or nearly an exajoule a year) which would otherwise be coming out of some of the planets worst coal-fired plants.
:shrug: Not good for the three gorges, good for the polar bears. Pick a box...
|
blindpig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-17-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. heads you lose, tails you lose. n/t |
Celtic warrior
(12 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-18-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
The problem here is that the dam crosses a major fault line and many well respected engineers the dam will fail... millions will die and the environmental damage will be incalculable
Celtic Warrior
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |