Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Xpost - 150 more US coal plants might be a bad thing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 02:47 AM
Original message
Xpost - 150 more US coal plants might be a bad thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interestingly, the advocacy group in question...
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 05:06 AM by NNadir
...is PIRG, the "Public Interest Advocacy Group," founded by one Ralph Nader, and dedicated to fighting against, among other things, nuclear energy.

(I used to contribute to PIRG, although not intentionally. For years, Nader had worked a deal where he could skim unaudited PIRG contributions off the top of college tuitions in many state university systems. Finally someone sued, and the practice was abandoned.)

For Nader, it was almost axiomatic that anybody who disagreed with him was a corporate lackey. "Nader sees critics as enemies," wrote Sanford, a former ally. "Those who do not serve him serve the evil elements of corporations." This Manichaean worldview came through in everything Nader did. In the 1970s, he worked to establish automatic funding for Public Interest Research Groups (pirg) on campus--proto-Naderite outfits to train the next generation of like-minded activists. Nader's preferred funding mechanism was for every student to automatically contribute $1; those who objected could go to the college administration for a refund. But the administration at Penn State University in 1975 opted instead for a positive checkoff, whereby each student would check a box if he wanted to pitch in $2 for the pirg. Nader attacked Penn State as "a citadel of fascism" and threatened one Penn State board member: "I would advise Mister Baker to study very carefully the meaning of conflict of interest if he wants to understand the kind of disclosures that will be forthcoming in the coming year."



http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040308&s=chait030804

PIRG believes that all of the world's energy can be provided by wind and solar. Barring that, they oppose energy completely. They have been getting what the wish all over the United States. Our grid is collapsing.

I recently told a PIRG solicitor to get off my property on the grounds that I don't let Naderites around my children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC