Windfarm regulations
Pombo's home town of Tracy, California has a large wind farm on Altamont Pass. In 2004, Pombo’s office sent a letter to then-Secretary of the Department of the Interior Gale Norton, urging the suspension of environmental guidelines opposed by the wind power industry. Pombo’s parents have received hundreds of thousands of dollars in royalties from wind-powered turbines on their 300-acre ranch. Pombo owns an interest in his parents' ranch.<17>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_PomboWind Entrepreneurs in the Wyly family - the Green Mountain people - were instrumental in presenting the former Governor of Texas, a guy named George W. Bush, as a man with impeccable environmental credentials.
http://www.boycottgreenmountain.com/mccain-ads-austin.htmlIt is not surprising at all that a person representing me as a "renewable hater" is as spectacularly misinformed about my position as he or she is about just about
everything else.
I don't hate renewable energy. On the other hand I do of despise low level thinkers who want to pretend that renewable energy alone can address climate change. If it could do so, I contend, we'd see some evidence already since people have been talking about this subject forever. I am not enthused by anyone's religion. I want something
done and therefore I engage in the wholly embarrassing enterprise of
acknowledging reality.
No more than anyone else on the planet, I am doing nothing to stop renewable energy. Everybody loves renewable energy. I merely note that this fact, that everybody loves it, coupled with the fact that after 50 years of loving it doesn't produce more than a pittance, means it's not
enough. We'll hear lots and lots of crap from jerk-offs about what solar energy
might do in 2050, but the same jerk-offs have not bothered to check whether their predecessors were saying the same damn thing in 1970. This is because the renewable conceit depends of a withered ability to comprehend very much. As part of this monumental capacity for self-delusion, denial, and outright misrepresentation, I note that many wind profiteers are Republicans, including
Congressman Pombo.
I simply note that there is
no data anywhere on earth, no announced plans anywhere on earth, to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy. Not one. Even the dunderheads at Greenpeace are talking - even though they make up most of what they say - about replacing 100% of fossil fuels. Instead they merely issue nonsense statements of what they
say might happen by 2050, usually some pathetic number between 30% and 70%. In fact though people speaking like them have a zero percent history of actually delivering anything other than circus stunts and self-promoting propaganda.
Given the half a century old tradition of wishful thinking on renewable energy, we need
nuclear energy. That's the core of my argument. Anything that comes from renewable energy in the next 50 years is welcome, but it won't be enough. I'm sorry that you can't grasp that any more than you can grasp that Pombo has been making money on wind energy for some time, probably longer than his replacement has. (None of this argues against wind, of course, but it simply means that noting that wind power is not a panacea makes one fond of Repukes.) Apparently that
fact that the world needs nuclear energy bugs you, but your position doesn't mean anything to anyone
serious. The anti-nuclear argument is as irrelevant as it is irrational. Right now the world is contemplating adding 56% as much new nuclear capacity as it has right now.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.htmMind you, nuclear energy has been producing on a tens of exajoules scale for more than two and a half decades now. In fact last year the world produced
more nuclear energy than ever before, about 2500 terawatt hours.
I note that as primary thermal energy, this capacity added to current capacity will amount to more than 60 exajoules of primary energy annually, just about half of the energy now provided by coal. I have little doubt that in the next 5 years the plans will include as much nuclear capacity as the entire coal output on the planet. I suspect that - as has happened in France - if this trend continues - the only use for coal by the middle of this century will be to make steel and maybe carbon fibers for tennis rackets and the like. None of the middle class brats in Greenpeace can doing a fucking thing about this trend. The world doesn't give a fuck what Greenpeace types think. Tough shit.