Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mexico's Oil Crisis Arrives - Cantarell Past Peak, Production Dropping 15%/Year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:52 AM
Original message
Mexico's Oil Crisis Arrives - Cantarell Past Peak, Production Dropping 15%/Year
EDIT

Early in the last century, the Mexican government enshrined national ownership of all hydrocarbon resources into its constitution, and in 1938 nationalized the industry with the establishment of state oil company PEMEX. The government of the day asked all Mexicans to help pay the costs of expropriating oil properties from foreign corporations. Families parted with treasured heirlooms to help government pay the expropriation costs. As a result, there is still a deeply emotional public attachment to the national company, which limits the ability of government to change the constitution to permit private investment. Any such change would require approval by a prohibitive two-thirds majority vote in the federal legislature as well as a majority of the state legislatures.

For decades, PEMEX did well for the country, managing to explore, produce, invest and pay taxes. Its conventional reserves grew to the point that Mexico ranked third in the western hemisphere, after Venezuela and the U.S. (Canada now ranks first, thanks to the Alberta oil sands). Oil prices rose, production increased, and the Mexican government became addicted to PEMEX's revenues. Instead of relying on taxation to finance expenditures, like most developed countries, the government took what it needed from PEMEX. The federal purse now takes more than 60 per cent of company revenues, which provide a third of the national budget. In spite of record high oil prices, PEMEX has run up massive debt and recently posted a net loss of US$7 billion for 2005.

The company is starved for investment funds to improve production in mature fields, such as the mammoth Cantarell -- where current production of almost two million barrels per day is projected to fall by 30 per cent in the next two years -- and to develop new discoveries such as the potentially vital Chicontepec field. As things stand currently, Mexico only has 10 years of oil reserves left.

The story on natural gas is even worse. Mexico's reserves have declined from 56.1 trillion cubic feet in 1999 to 48.6 trillion in 2005. Although PEMEX has managed to increase production slightly in the last three years, consumption has considerably outpaced domestic supply, forcing the country to become a net importer from the U.S. This trend is expected to continue.

EDIT

http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/business/article.jsp?content=20061113_136459_136459

MEXICO CITY — When a Yucatan fisherman named Rudecindo Cantarell first noticed oil bubbling up into the waters of Campeche Sound in 1976, Russia was still Communist, Rocky won the Oscar for best picture and the notion of a political party other than the Institutional Revolutionary Party running Mexico unimaginable. Thirty years on, the Cantarell field -- second in size to Saudi Arabia's Ghawar complex and source of 60 per cent of Mexico's total production -- has begun to decline.

From a 2004 peak output of more than 2.1 million barrels of oil a day, Cantarell is down to 1.8 million b/d today, and will continue to diminish in the coming years. And its waning only seems to underscore the challenges facing the country's monopolistic state-run oil giant, Petroleos Mexicanos. The world's third-largest oil producer, Pemex "has no real prospects to substitute for Cantarell," oil analyst David Shields says. In spite of booming oil prices and record sales worth $86-billion (U.S.), it ended last year $7.1-billion in the red and has debt of $54-billion.

Output fell 4.6 per cent in August from a year earlier, and proven reserves stand at 16.5 billion barrels, representing eight to 10 years of assured production. What's more, as a state monopoly, Pemex has long been a sinecure for presidential cronies, loses an estimated $1-billion every year in corruption and suffers continual pipeline leaks and explosions.

The undersecretary for hydrocarbons at the Ministry of Energy, Hector Moreira, has been sounding the alarm bells recently, warning Pemex could go bankrupt within the next six years because of its debt. In an interview, however, Mr. Moreira played down that scenario somewhat, but admitted "that doesn't negate the fact that Pemex's debt is increasing, and that we need to do something to stop and reverse that. We cannot keep on accumulating debt."

EDIT

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061114.wxrpemex14/BNStory/Business/home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not to be rhetorical...
but I often wonder, is anybody in charge paying attention to these developments? Because it's clearly some serious shit, and it's a near-term threat. If, like most people, you get all your news from network TV and/or talk radio, you simply wouldn't know this was happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, and I propose we put this one on the "greatest page"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why, thank you!
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 11:04 AM by hatrack
There is little doubt as to our nation's collective knowledge of Reese, Brangelina and Britney.

The only question is whether mathematics can express that collective knowledge in terms of our understanding of geology in any meaningful way. I mean, can you even write ratios like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Only as something like the limit of 1/n as n -> infinity.
Or maybe a probability with support only on discrete elements of the real line. Technically, it exists, but it's measure is zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm pleased to add the 5th vote!
Thank you, Hatrack - this is essential information.

Not only is it important from an energy perspective...but...
what happens to the internal stability of Mexico as the
budget gets tight? If there are poor and desperate people
now, what happens in 2 years? In 5?

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfisher Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Just the point that
entered my head. Nationalization did little to reform the economy of Mexico, except to solidify the ruling elites and keep the population inpoverty. When the golden goose begins to croak, how many more desperate Mexicans will be forced to seek relief up North?
This won't be a mass media story until the shit hits the fan... THEN it will be a story! SHIT HITS FAN! Pictures at eleven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dear Mr. Hatrack,
I've got to congratulate you on your efforts.

You're prolific!

Granted it's mostly doom and gloom. But I like it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe when the oil dries up, the US might quit meddling so much in Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC