(snip)
WASHINGTON -- The idea seems like something out of a Superman comic: A machine or missile shoots tons of particles into the atmosphere that would block the sun's rays, cool down the overheated Earth, and reverse global warming.
Article Tools
But today some of the country's leading minds in science, history, and economics will gather in a closed session organized by NASA and Stanford University to discuss researching such a strategy -- a subject long taboo in environmental circles because so much could go wrong. Some fear it would be seen as a quick fix, replacing the need to reduce fossil fuel emissions, but others contend that the world needs an emergency plan in case global warming triggers a catastrophe, such as a break up of the Greenland ice sheet and massive flooding in coastal regions.
(snip)
(snip)
"Is it better to let polar bears go extinct and let the ice sheets melt? Is it worse to inject some aerosols into the stratosphere that could deflect some sunlight?" said Ken Caldeira , a climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution's Department of Global Ecology at Stanford University, which is hosting the two-day meeting.
(snip)
(snip)
Those scientists who believe it could work point to the eruption of volcanoes in which masses of particles have deflected sunlight and reduced global temperatures by an average of 0.9 degrees.
(snip)
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/11/18/talk_of_manipulating_earths_climate/It really seems like we're hearing this sort of idea more and more lately...not a good trend IMHO.