Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

22 States Ticked At ChimpCo Mercury Standards, Setting Own Policies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:08 AM
Original message
22 States Ticked At ChimpCo Mercury Standards, Setting Own Policies
EDIT

The trend of states bucking the Bush administration became apparent Friday, the deadline for states to submit their plans for reducing toxic mercury emissions to the Environmental Protection Agency. States' responses were tallied by the National Association of Clean Air Agencies.

"At least 22 states have gone beyond EPA's rule in three ways," said Bill Becker, the association's executive director. "They have either adopted more stringent regulations, accelerated compliance deadlines or restricted interstate trading of mercury. Some have done more than one of those."

States most frequently chose to require cuts of up to 90 percent in mercury pollution, speed up federal requirements by about three to five years or reject the administration's decision to let companies turn to the marketplace to buy and sell rights to emit mercury. Becker estimated that the tougher state rules would generally add about $1 a month to the average household's utility bills.

The rest of the states are roughly split among those accepting EPA's regulations as sufficient and those that are still trying to figure out what they plan to do, according to Dan Riedinger, a spokesman for Edison Electric Institute, a utility trade association that favors the EPA approach.

EDIT

http://www.forbes.com/business/healthcare/feeds/ap/2006/11/17/ap3186847.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. States really do need to pick up the slack
In fact I'm coming to the conclusion this is in fact the best way - for states and localities to move forward with sound ecological plans - despite the apparent problems that can come with multiple small plans (state and local) vs a few large plans (national). Somethings will have to be done at a national and global level but I think many if not most issues can and will be addressed at more local levels, states are capable of cooperating at regional and even international levels too and we will need some flexibility for trying different systems in order to find the best systems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC