Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Environmental cost of Sweden's imported food

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:41 AM
Original message
Environmental cost of Sweden's imported food
http://www.energybulletin.net/22737.html

In Sweden, as in other industrial countries, food travels across continents and over oceans before it reaches the table. Two new publications examine how much energy and greenhouse gases are produced in producing food and getting it to Sweden. Both of them are starting points for discussion rather than peer-reviewed literature-and the discussions turn up some surprises.

On November 14, the Stockholm Consumer's Association released a study of the environmental effect of broccoli production and transport to Stockholm. The study was carried out by the Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology. Broccoli was chosen as a case study because the broccoli sold in Sweden comes from just a few countries with very different agricultural conditions.

The "Broccoli report" showed that broccoli produced in Sweden led to 60% less greenhouse emissions than imported broccoli. And 99% of all broccoli that is consumed in Sweden is imported, with Spain and Ecuador as major exporters. Interestingly enough, transporting the broccoli from Ecuador produced about 40% of the greenhouse gas emissions of transporting Spanish broccoli even though the broccoli from Ecuador is transported 12,000 km compared to 3,200 km for Spanish broccoli. Ecuador's broccoli is shipped by boat to Rotterdam, by feeder boat to Gothenburg, Sweden, and then by truck to Stockholm. Spanish broccoli travels by truck the entire way.

The report also calculates the economic costs of broccoli from different sources. Switching entirely to Swedish-produced broccoli would cost more than twice as much as the current mix of 1% Swedish, 33% Spanish, and 66% Ecuadorian and Guatemalan.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting
I am wondering whether they are considering decreasing the Spanish imports as a result.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is exactly the rationale behind the 100 mile diet
Home grown broccoli is WAY less environmentally costly. Why should the Swedes get Ecuadoran broccoli? And why should Spanish broccoli be so resource intensive?

If you literally can't grow broccoli in Sweden, grow something else, but don't trash the planet to get your crucifers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC