prodigal_green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-02-04 07:07 PM
Original message |
So whom do we sue if the worst happens? |
|
They tell us there is credible evidence of an imminent attack on certain properties and/or cities while simultaneously telling us to go about our normal routine. So, my question is, whom do we sue if we suffer injury or lose a loved one in an attack?
Could you imagine a local coastal community being told that a category 5 hurricaine was coming, but don't bother evacuating, just go about your business?
They are trying to force us into a state of cognitive dissonance. Makes us easier to mind-f*ck/control later.
|
jeff30997
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-02-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-02-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I Seriously hought About This On My Way Home |
|
BTW - NPR is a Republican Upper Class Bull Horn.
|
prodigal_green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-02-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. WNYC still has some credibility |
|
it's the local affilliate.
|
pookastew
(187 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-02-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Well, whoever you sue, you won't be able to collect insurance... |
|
...cause they all had "terrorism" exemptions written in.
So when the terrorists do hit again, we'll all be s*** out of luck. If I lose my house I'm just screwed.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |