Homicide rates versus city population size prove large cities should be banned.

[jody]

Population group            Homicide Rate
TOTAL ALL AGENCIES:               5.9
TOTAL CITIES                      6.8
GROUP I  (250,000 and over)      11.9
GROUP II (100,000 to 249,999)     8.6
GROUP III (50,000 to 99,999)      4.9
GROUP IV (25,000 to 49,999)       3.5
GROUP V (10,000 to 24,999)        2.9
GROUP VI (under 10,000)           2.6
METROPOLITAN COUNTIES             4.2
NONMETROPOLITAN COUNTIES1         3.3
SUBURBAN AREA2                    3.4

SOURCE http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/data/table_16.html

[iverglas]

1. intelligent / intelligible content rate vs. jody's post count proves

...

[Trajan]

2. A questionable attempt to link the 'danger' of objects ...

To the 'danger' of place ....

You cannot 'ban' a place ...

BTW: We don't want your silly guns ....

I SWEAR I am going to offer Skinner serious ducketts to get the Gungeon off the main discussion page : I/P isn't routed to the main discussion page, and there is no reason the politically volatile Gungeon should be afforded special privileges ...

[rangersmith82]

3. Explain..who is we,,....

We don't want a ban and you don't want a gun.

I tell you what you let us keep our guns, and you can keep your cities....

[Trajan]

4. Well .... That sounds like a threat ....

Feeling pretty mighty are ya ? .... Isnt that special .....

We will keep the cities, and you will follow the law, or you will be arrested by the proper authorities ...

These 'bold' threats by the Mighty Mice of the Internets are hilarious ....

[iverglas]

5. you really want the reading DU public

to miss out on the chance to see gems like this???

Snork.

[Trajan]

6. Chuckles ...

I am sorry ..... I fergot how wonderfully optimistic the Gungeon can really be ...

My bad .... Mea Culpa .... Nevermind ....

:silly:

[Tejas]

9. Optimism? You mean like "blood running in the streets"?

"OMG!!1!, GUNS!1!!, BLOOD IN THE STREETS BLAH BLAH BLAH"




uh huh, I get tired of it too.

[jody]

7. You want to limit discussion of a right protected by our Constitution. That's censorship.

I'm not surprised since you have never presented one fact or logical reason why if we humans have natural, inherent, inalienable rights, the most basic of those rights self-defense should be banned from discussion on DU.

[iverglas]

8. see?

Now who would want to miss jody calling the decisions of the owners of this private property "censorship"??


I'm not surprised since you have never presented one fact or logical reason why if we humans have natural, inherent, inalienable rights, the most basic of those rights self-defense should be banned from discussion on DU.

And how surprising would that be, since that is not what the poster proposed at all ...

Why have you never presented a cogent argument for eating dirt, jody?

[Tejas]

10. take a pill

"I SWEAR I am going to offer Skinner serious ducketts to get the Gungeon off the main discussion page"


Why do you persist in acting as if your personal preferences are of some relevance here?

[iverglas]

11. too funny

Really.

You people actually never have grasped the concept of irony, have you?

[applegrove]

12. Don't evil people leave small towns (where they can't hide their evilness cause everyone knows every

one) and move around (to big cities) to find more people to prey upon? Doesn't change the fact that big cities are more dangerous.

[jody]

13. Perhaps but it could also be that victims are attracted to big cities. Bottom line is the larger the

city, the greater the crime rate.

[Name removed]

14. Deleted sub-thread

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.