Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missouri judge strikes down CCW law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Romulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 03:50 PM
Original message
Missouri judge strikes down CCW law
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 04:15 PM by Romulus
Judge continues order against concealed guns

A St. Louis judge ruled today that Missouri's concealed gun law violates the state constitution and ordered that that new statute remain unimplemented.

The ruling by Circuit Judge Steven Ohmer clears the way for the Missouri Supreme Court to consider the matter.


*snip*

An attorney for the National Rifle Association, which intervened in the case, said the constitutional provision is not meant as a prohibition against concealed guns. Attorney Stephen Halbrook noted there are already exemptions -- police can carry concealed guns, residents can conceal them in their homes.

*snip*

"This is what I expected and what we supporters of this bill expected," (pro-CCW legislator)Crawford said. "We knew that it was going to the Supreme Court either way. Now I'm confident it will be appealed by the attorney general and the other attorneys involved to the Supreme Court, where we intend to prevail."

*snip*

Opponents sued on claims the law violates a state constitution provision dating to 1875 that guarantees the right to bear arms and adds "but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons."

*snip/more*

It seems weird that the state constitution is being argued as barring CCW by citizens, but off-duty LEO's seem to get a pass. Sounds like an Asscroft special to me - "power to the favored few."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stilgar Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its about time he let go of it
Opponents sued on claims the law violates a state constitution provision dating to 1875 that guarantees the right to bear arms and adds "but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons."

Either way he ruled it was to be appealed, I am just glad he made a ruling and it can go on and be appealed.

the RIGHT to a gun does not mean you can hide it is what it says,
but that does not mean you cant legislate the ability to hide it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC