Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bans piss off Democrats too (personal account)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:38 PM
Original message
Bans piss off Democrats too (personal account)
"None of them will vote for the democratic presidential candidates because of their absurd positions on guns."-Emoto

Another poster maintains that the gun issue is only worth a "tiny clot of voters" to the Democratic party. Hopefully, folks will read the following and see this is nowhere near the truth. This is a short account of my experiences as a machinist living in Mn working third shift during and after the AW bill/law and the brady bill/law, relating mostly to the AW ban.


I'm a machinist. For the most part, I have worked in non-union shops all my working-life. For anyone not familiar with the trade(though I don't imagine there are to many) it "contains" mostly folks highly proficient in math, highly mechanically inclined, and they are in my experience a group comprised primarily of Democrats. I have only met a dozen or 3 however who would vote for a pro-gun-control candidate in my entire time in the business. Back around the time when the AW had just passed, there were hundreds-literally HUNDREDS, crowded around the bulletin board at the shop, before shift change. Folks from both shifts made it impossible to get into the lunchroom to punch in, and prompted an ass chewing, because the mob was right in "center view" of the hallway security camera, which the company president liked to look at every morning, and had a tendency to bring up at company meetings and performance reviews. He looked for every reason to try the "15 cent" raise on as many people as he could. 15 cents is pretty much a slap in the face for a job well done IMO. Guess I'm still a bit hot about that...chiseler.

Tim was the plant manager, and did the ass chewing. He was usually a decent guy, provided noone was in camera range. The bulletin board at that time had news, info on the AW laws, then later info on exactly what the laws did, what guns were now "assault" weapons, banned, etc. For alot of us on third shift, cable TV in the lunchroom, and the bulletin board were our main sources of news. Work all nite...sleep all day...you get the picture. At Lunch, Tim sugested those interested meet at the fields after work, "unofficial" meeting, the purpose of which, to talk about the AW ban. Everyone knew where the fields were, because our company co-ed softball team played and practiced there. Word got around the shop fast. So morning comes, and we punch out and go. "We" turns out to be alot of us. Cars going around the bend in front of me looked like a funeral procession, and they filled up a verry large portion of the parking lot.


I started there in sept 1992, and was there for 5 and a half years, during which time the AW ban and the brady bill passed into law, and I can tell one thing for sure. There were at LEAST 100 people out of the 220-some employees on my shift, that were angry about the AW ban. Even back then, these folks understood it for what it was- a simple cosmetic ban. The bulletin board info made it abundantly clear. They percieved a ban of this nature to be an intentional thorn in the side of lawful gun owners. The reason I can say with accuracy that it was 100 plus, is that when we met at the park where the softball fields are that morning after our shift got out, Tim starts doing a headcount because it looks like most of the shift has shown up. Then he decides it would be easier to count who isn't there, so we divide ourselves by department, and the department lead's count who isn't present from their department. Tim chuckles, and jokes that there are almost enough people present to run the shop at full capacity. There weren't, but the actual headcount was in the 130ish area(I don't recall the exact number). It was a CLEAR majority of the people working my shift though. These are blue collar working folks, part of the core of Democratic voters. MN being a liberal and Democratic state, they didn't have much of anything good to say about b*sh 1. They had since I worked there been doing things like saying "read my lips", and "saddam" pronounced "sad-dum" over the intercom. They weren't too happy with the "read my lips" fiasco, and I wasn't iether. These are honest working folks, why would they be? Why would anyone be for that matter. When I first started there, EVERYONE was talking about Bill Clinton, comparing him to b*sh 1. Saying how much better off we were going to be under Clinton.

The AW ban changed that.


The most commonly spoken comments at that meeting were something along the lines of "I feel betrayed, but I DON'T want to vote republican next election", and "I WON'T vote for an anti-gun candidate EVER AGAIN" and "why don't they try criminal control instead of gun control". There were alot of ...expletives thrown around. Some folks said little, and mostly shook thier heads in disgust. Others were...visably verry angry. Even though the great majority were Democraticly inclined voters, they were also gun owners, hunters, target shooters and collectors. These folks were formerly Bill Clinton supporters, including myself. And now they were extremely pissed. I agreed with them, and was pretty pissed too. None of them that I talked-to-regularly(and that was most of them) voted Democratic that next election year, or the one after that(2000). Nor did I. I haven't voted except local elections since 1992, and even then, I refuse to vote for an anti-gun candidate from any party. I became a stuck-between voter. Stuck between 2 partys that BOTH condemned beliefs I hold dear. At least, thats how I felt at the time, and how the anti's get me feeling from time to time.

The employees at that shop are still a pretty tight group, and even now, 1900 miles, several employers and a few years later, I still talk to alot of them. 5 of them are my closest friends, besides my other half, who IS my best friend, hands down. They STILL see Democrats as a threat to law abiding gun owners (whether thats truth or not matters little, where votes are concerned, perception is everything)and "None of them will vote for the democratic presidential candidates because of their absurd positions on guns" either, whether that position is real or percieved.

Incidentally, the shop in this account made precision medical parts,precision computer parts, and the like...NO military OR firearms OR defense related work at all. Also, the majority of folks I encountered didn't have any problem with the brady bill, just the AW ban. Those who DID have a problem with the brady bill were worried about registration/confiscation in the wake of the AW ban, but were few and far between.

This IMO, BLOWS A HUGE HOLE in any theory that most gun owners support gun control where bans are concerned, and completely backs up what Emoto said:"just pointing out that alienating a traditional base is not the best way to win elections."-Emoto


Any other machinists here care to share experiences or views encountered in the business? I don't know why it is, but this trade always seems to have alot of pro-gun folks in it.

I was trying to get this posted yesterday, but the other half made me stop and rest. We just found out that the myself, the other half, and one of our daughters don't have bronchitis like we thought, but have pneumonia(sp?), and youngest daughter is getting it now too. Food ciggs and soda taste "wrong", and typing alone is quite exhausting. Its going to be a long weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. my dad was a machinist and a democratic union member
and very pro gun ownership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My Father Was a Maintenance Mechanic and a Union Member
An ex-Marine and life-long Democrat who owned guns that were all registerd with the local police department. He supported gun control to keep guns out of the wrong hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know a bunch of union members
and almost all of them are more concerned about the crappy economy and the mess in Iraq than whther Dianne Feinstein is going to take anybody's little metal phallus away....

And one local union shop is currently raising funds to help a cop who was shot with an assault weapon and is not expected to walk again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ROTFLMAO!!!!
"whther Dianne Feinstein is going to take anybody's little metal phallus away...."


That comment wouldn't be NEARLY as funny if she didn't have her own "little metal phallus" and a permit to carry it....

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ive called her office
She no longer has a permit to carry and doesnt feel that anyone else needs one. Atleast thats what i remember the guy saying but its been a year or so since i called.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarinKaryn Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Cite please
Need info on Sen Feinstein's permit and weapon. No second-hand, info that a "friend" knows is true, "I heard it on NewsMax" stuff.

Just a valid cite proving what you said is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Don't hold your breath
It's another piece of gun nut hooey....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Here ya go...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianne_Feinstein

Is Wikipedia a right wing source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarinKaryn Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I don't know what to say
Is this source valid? It seems wierd that they would devote an entire paragraph (from a 7 para cite) to her gun permit and personal weapon. And they seem to be slamming her for carrying.

Is this a right wingers source or should it be considered truthful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpelGT Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Well........
If you choose not to believe that source, how about her own words?

U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) on terrorism and self-defense:
The following comments were made by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) during U.S. Senate hearings on terrorism held in Washington, D.C. on April 27, 1995:

"I know the urge to arm yourself because that's what I did. I was trained in firearms. I'd walk to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out, I was going to take them with me."

Source: CSPAN Coverage 04/27/95.

If the CSPAN site is not sufficient, I'm pretty sure there is a process to get the transcripts of the Seante hearing itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Guess what
If you guessed pantload, you guessed correctly....

"Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that is being written collaboratively by the readers. The site is a WikiWiki, meaning that anyone, you included, can edit any article right now by clicking on the edit this page link that appears in every Wikipedia article that is not designated as a protected page."

http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About

Want Feinstein not only to have a pistol permit, but to have shot cattle rustlers with her pearl handled six-guns while out riding the range on her horse Prickly Pete? All it takes are some clicks of the mouse at Wikipedia.

Yumpin' yiminy, THERE's an authoritative source!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarinKaryn Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I guess that explains the heavy coverage of her alledged CCW
It seemed too weird that a reputable source would devote so much slanted coverage (1 of 7 paragraphs) to her alledged gun.

I'm claiming biased source.

Maybe I should revise the entry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I wonder if Charlton Heston has an entry
hmmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It's even funnier
when you realize that most of the scum claiming Dianne Feinstein is hot to "grab their gun" actually couldn't get a decent, accomplished and cultured woman like the Senator to touch them with a ten-foot pole....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yes or no question.
Is your hatred for gun owners so great that you are willing to seek to make the party as inhospitable to gun owners as possible and turn away votes from folks with beliefs such as those below just because they are also pro-gun?

Pro choice
Anti-drug war
Pro-(legal)immigration
Anti-corporation
Pro-small business
Anti-racism
Anti-elitism
Anti-classism


Yes or No will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Who are you trying to kid?
How many pro-choice people are planning to toss that away and start waving fetus pictures outside the clinics because they can't get their hands on assault weapons?

By the way, what is this "anti-elitism" crap that now keeps dancing in among the usual RKBA rubbish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. yikes

How did I miss that before I posted mine? ;)

I guess I just get all excited when I see a loaded ... question.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You seem a little short-winded today...
are you feeling OK?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. hey, friend

"Is your hatred for gun owners so great that you are willing to seek to make the party as inhospitable to gun owners as possible and turn away votes from folks with beliefs such as those below just because they are also pro-gun?"

Have you stopped beating your dog yet?

If I may quote you: Yes or No will do.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. By the way
Do YOU know who these "anti-elitists" are when they're at home? People who refuse to listen to classical music? People who don't bathe and defiantly chew with their mouths open (that'll show them elites chomp chomp chomp)?

I wonder if this is the same right wing bit of horseshit that people who were trying to prop up segregation used to use. (Only "elites" want to end Jim Crow because they won't have to live and woik with black people and you will, the scum used to say in the 1960s.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarinKaryn Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. A nice story, but completely useless for debate.
Anyone can come up with a little story like this that supports their position, but frankly, Mary Rosh's data is more credibile than tales about the guys at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. By the way...
have you noticed that so many of these gun nuts claiming "all the union workers around here are obsessed with guns-guns-guns" also claim to be in "right to work" states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. now your just being down right dishonest bench
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Hey, gato...
I'm not the one trying to pass off NRA convention speaker Jeb Bush's cops beating up non-violent protestors as anything but what it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I do not think you qualify as an adequate judge of credibility
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I'd put her ahead of you, fly
and ahead of the whole RKBA crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarinKaryn Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Ouch. In spite of that I think you really agree with me.
Second hand stories are useless as evidence. Only facts will win or lose an argument. Disagree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. No, I do not.
Let's say there's this fact....um "Pure quartz is made of Silicon and Oxygen"

Joe does some research and publishes a piece that "Pure quartz is indeed made of oxygen and silicon."

Larry Reads the report and tells Betty that "Pure quartz is made of silicon and oxygen."

Where, in all that second-hand knowledge, was the fact lost?

If I see a story on CNN and come tell you all what I saw, are you going to question MY credibility or are you going to discuss the issue presented by CNN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. Ok, facts.
The fact is, people in the story ARE stuck between the 2 partys. I am one of them. Or is that too "second hand" for you?

And, you missed the point. Part of the discussion (at least as I intended) was to see if there were any other machinists here, and discuss with them thier experiences with political affiliation within the field and reaction within that affiliation to the AW ban.

"Only facts will win or lose an argument."

Of course, you are correct. However, I wasn't really looking for an argument when I posted the story. I was looking for others who feel like they are in the same boat politically, and others in the same field, and input from both. It wasn't until there was a snide comment by a poster that this thread went semi-south. I guess all the civility I experienced the other day spoiled me.

And, maybe to blow off some steam. Try being stuck between partys for 11 years while extremists on both sides attack YOUR way of life
and haveing close friends stuck too, and see how you feel. You may need to express some frustration after that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhfenton Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Compelling story
"None of them that I talked-to-regularly (and that was most of them) voted Democratic that next election year, or the one after that(2000). Nor did I. I haven't voted except local elections since 1992, and even then, I refuse to vote for an anti-gun candidate from any party. I became a stuck-between voter. Stuck between 2 partys that BOTH condemned beliefs I hold dear. At least, thats how I felt at the time, and how the anti's get me feeling from time to time."

Great story. It's a good illustration of why the Republicans now control the White House and both houses of Congress.

I voted for Bill Clinton in 1992. In 1996 and 2000, I voted for a third party candidate, because I couldn't vote for Clinton or Dole or Gore or Bush. So I was stuck casting protest votes.

So you're not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If That's Truly Your Recent Voting Record......
....how can you consider yourself a progressive Democrat?

Hmmmmmmmmmm????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhfenton Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I consider myself a Democrat.
That's a matter of public record.

Any other labels apply to varying degrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Funny...
The front page of your website doesn't say you're a Democrat...

http://www.johnfenton.org/

And though your "links" page links to Democrats, it also links to Republicans and the Libertarians....but not the AFL-CIO. And it amusingly lists these sites as "nonpartisan"

"NRA Institute for Legislative Action
National Review Online
The Cato Institute"

Are you REALLY trying to pretend Crazy Bill Buckley's propagnada rag is "nonpartisan?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarinKaryn Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. 3 links to repugs, 3 to Dems, won't vote Clinton/Gore
The Democrats thank you for your support. NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. You'll also notice
no mention at all of the AFL-CIO on his own page...now there's somebody with the working person's best interest in his heart...

Incidentally, the link to the Norwood City Council doesn't give party affiliation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. So the Naderites are not progressives?
They'll be THRILLED to hear that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. It sucks
Stuck between a party that I really don't want to belong to, that wants to cram religion down everyones throat, trample first amendment rights, trash the environment, let corporations do whatever they want,
and is quickly approaching "big brother"

AND

A party that I would really like to vote for and be active in, and fits the great majority of my beliefs, but has a few prominent members who want to ban firearms or certain types of firearms, something I will NEVER support.

My "protest vote" has been to stay home and watch stargate SG-1 or farscape. I know I'm not alone, but it's still not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. here's benchley and CO 's precious gun controllers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. some more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. with fascist like these who wants them to have even more control
CO and benchley that's who
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. feel safer yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Too TOO funny, Gato
How telling that you have to resort now to open outright lies...

Those are Jeb Bush's cops...

"Kayne Robinson, former chairman of the Republican Party of Iowa, took over the duties of president on Saturday, including presenting Florida Gov. Jeb Bush with a flintlock rifle during a banquet. Heston was supposed to present Bush with the firearm.
Bush, the keynote speaker, credited the NRA with helping his brother, President Bush, win the 2000 presidential election.
"Were it not for your active involvement, it's safe to say my brother may not have been president of the United States," Bush said.
"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/28/politics/main551275.shtml

Yeah, THAT Jeb Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. the very same people you want to give more power to
very odd
something smells fishy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Not me, gato, that's you and your fellow RKBA "enthusiasts"
pimping Jebbo's far right wing agenda...

Nice playmate you got there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Keep in mind
If you you have views like being Pro choice, Anti-drug war,
Pro-(legal)immigration, Anti-corporation, Pro-small business,
Anti-racism, Anti-elitism, Anti-classism,


BUT

you are pro gun, then your "pimping Jebbo's far right wing agenda..." :eyes:











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. yep the black and white zero-sum world of benchley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Hey, gato, give us all a BIG laugh
Explain to us what the term "zero sum" means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. So beev...
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 09:47 AM by MrBenchley
You EVER going to tell us what this "anti-elitism" crap is that you keep yowling about....

Do you oppose folks who wear shoes indoors? People who read books that don't have pictures? People who have more than one shirt? Ballet afiocionados?

Makes me suspect that it's the same horseshit that used to be shoveled during the dying days of Jim Crow: "The elite don't care that you'll have to live and work with black people, because they'll be off in their limousines and mansions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Point taken about the question, so I'll unload it
Do you have a hatred for gun owners so great that you are willing to seek to make the party as inhospitable to gun owners as possible and turn away votes from folks with beliefs such as those below just because they are also pro-gun?

Pro choice
Anti-drug war
Pro-(legal)immigration
Anti-corporation
Pro-small business
Anti-racism
Anti-elitism
Anti-classism

Nothing implied.

That better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DocSavage Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. Big Tent
Where is the big tent? It seems that if you in any way support the right to bear arms, there is no place for you in the party. Any discussion about Brady and you get "What a Pantload". Mention the NRA and you are a racist. It is like discussing Homosexuality with a born again christian.

The facts are, as seen on this board, there are people in the Democratic Party that own guns and believe there is a right to own them in the constitution. There are people in the Democratic party that are worried about the retoric from members of the party concerning banning guns will turn away voters.

You can put your head in the sand and just dismiss us as a small group of "Gun Nuts", but there are alot of people out here in middle america that feel this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Gee, you can find pretty much all of the big tent
over on the NRA enemies list...the NAACP, NOW, the Americans for Democratic Action, the ACLU, the American Bar Association, the National Education Association, the American Medical Association, Common Cause, the American Federation of Teachers (say, aren't they a union?), B'nai B'rith, the Congress of National Black Churches, the Gray Panthers, Hadassah, the Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, the League of Women Voters, the National PTA, the National Urban League, Public Citizen, the YWCA, the Women's National Democratic Club, etc. ...you want the Democrats to kick all those people out and snuggle up to the gun loonies? Fat chance.

"The facts are, as seen on this board, there are people in the Democratic Party that own guns and believe there is a right to own them in the constitution."
And another fact is that they are in the minority in the Democratic party, and well out of the mainstream. And yet another fact is that the "right to own guns in the constitution" is a flat-out lie engineered by the gun lobby.

"There are people in the Democratic party that are worried about the retoric from members of the party concerning banning guns will turn away voters. "
And there are more people in the Democratic party who want to offer a clear alternative to John AshKKKroft, Ted Nugent and Larry Pratt, as a MAJORITY of voters around the country wish. Including a majority of gun owners.

"Mention the NRA and you are a racist"
Gee, the leadership of the NRA includes a number of quite vocal and openly racist scumbags, with nary a murmur of dissent from the gun owners here. Instead the constant complaint is about how horrible it is that anybody mention in public that the scum of the earth IS the scum of the earth.

So tell us, if there really ARE rootin' tootin' gun totin' liberals, and if "gun rights" is NOT just the newest code for old-fashioned racism, where are the "gun rights" advocates kicking up a stink about specimens like Larry Pratt and Ted Nugent? So far we ain't found even one out in the public where other "gun rights" advocates could hear them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC