Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

‘Made in NH’ gun lawserves no real purpose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:34 PM
Original message
‘Made in NH’ gun lawserves no real purpose
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/opinioneditorials/909704-263/made-in-nh-gun-lawserves-no-real.html

Here’s some good news for all those private gunsmiths who make guns from scratch in the Granite State, then sell them only to New Hampshire residents for use only within state borders.

A bill that cleared the state House of Representatives last week would make sure such weapons are free from federal regulations, background disclosures or taxes.

Any federal law enforcement agent attempting to impose the laws of the United States on these “New Hampshire only” weapons could be arrested and charged with a felony, if the “Made in New Hampshire” gun law clears the Senate and is signed into law.

As we reported Feb. 16, the 240-120 House vote was another clear signal that Second Amendment supporters are finding much to like in the Republican-dominated Legislature elected with the backing of the National Rifle Association faithful.

<more>

Republic douchebaggery never ceases to amaze

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Several states have passed similar laws
Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the subject of this law was cannabis and not guns, would you still disapprove of it?
Or do your principles only go so far, and no farther?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Federal law supersedes state law
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're a drug warrior, as well? Why am I not a bit surprised? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Makie shit up much?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. I suggest you try a new tactic.
It's commonly refered to as "Answer the question". Sometimes with an obscene adjective thrown in for good measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. That was my response to made up shit
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. If you answer questions directly, or simply but politely refuse to do so...
Edited on Mon Feb-21-11 03:56 PM by PavePusher
it will have an amazing affect on your credibility and the ability of others to make assumptions about your positions.

Fact.

yup.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Yeah, the threats/attacks posted against me really had an amazing effect on my credibility
fact

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. "threats/attacks"? oreeeeeely?
I'm sure you can cite them, amIrite?

Although I will give you the benefit of the doubt, as I don't often get to see the deleted comments before they disappear. So I aknowledge that I may have missed some.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not exactly.
It does in cases where there is dual authority between states and the Feds. But if the constitution doesn't specifically give the authority to the Feds then the states supersede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Not Always.
The Commerce Clause of the Constitution restricts the reach of Federal Law into State business as does the 10th Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Isn't that what republics have against Obamacare?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Irrelevant. The law is the law. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. FAIL, and weak as hell!
Come on, you can do better than that...... on second thought, no you can't!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. This word "republic"....
You keep using it. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Limpaugh Hannity FOX et al. call the Democratic Party the Democrat (sic) Party
I call republicans "republics" to remind them of their stupid douchebaggery

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Not with regards to INTRASTATE commerce....
I can see your not very up to date on constitutional law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speltwon Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Not when there is no interstate commerce nexus
That is how (see: Raich for example) the feds got jurisdiction over medical mj in california, by twisting the commerce clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Only if cannabis killed like guns do.
Will America at some point get over its gun addiction -- or will that addiction just be one more nail in America's coffin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken_Fish Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Alcohol First. Working on a College Campus
provides some perspective.. Alcohol is involved in FAR more fatal accidents around town and cases of rape / sex assault / dozen other crimes on campus than firearms. FAR MORE.

Its a city mouse country mouse thing, just like prohibition was.

The majority of educated people I meet pretty much agree that the real issues at play around violence in the US correlates to mental health, drug law / culture, and poverty.

"Gun Control" supply side restrictions to consumers not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. The body count along the southern border is piling up...
If you don't think the activities related to americans smoking pot have killed people then you need a reality check. How many people do weed-supplying drug cartels have to kill before you're cognizant that pot kills alot more people than you'd like to acknowledge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. 30,000 dead Mexicans
just so you can smoke your brains out.



You may not have pulled the trigger, but you paid for the bullets. If you insisted on dead Mexican free dope maybe you'd have a leg to stand on. It worked for dolphins and tuna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. WELL SAID!
For those of you who *try* to disagree, be careful you don't make a hypocrite out of yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. But dope didnt kill them
Money did . The economic engine that is prohibition is to blame . Prohibitionists are to blame .

If they get their way and all the guns suddenly were to evaporate , the gun prohibitionists would still find something else to blame it on ,something else to regulate , something else to ban , to control , to tax , to ....to .. avoid getting a real fucking job .

They get dental probably , so I cant really blame them . Not like you'd wanna go to Mexico and get your teeth fixed cheap anymore .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. But, wait!!!
There's even more good news coming out of Granite State ("Live Free or Die")...

:toast:

HB334 (correcting holes in the preemption statute (159.26))
HB125 will begin to correct the BATF over-reach
HB330 Constitutional Carry
HB378 Criminal threatening
HB235 Firearms in cars in private parking lots
HB544 Adding knives to the pre-emption statute 159:26
HB344 Correcting oversights and loop holes in the pre-emption statute. 159:26


H-0009 Relative to State Authority over Firearms and Ammunition
H-0012 Relative to Carrying Firearms
H-0030 HB29 Permitting a person to petition the superior court for any action pertaining to a pistol or revolver license.
H-0031 Relative to the State's Authority to Prohibit or regulate firearms, firearms components, ammunition or firearms supplies.
H-0039 Relative to Physical Force in Defense of a Person
H-0078 HB125 Relative to lawful commerce in firearms, including manufacture and sale, in New Hampshire.
H-0339 Relative to Physical Force in Defense of a Person
H-0341 Relative to Physical Force in Defense of a Person
H-0440 inserting an exception to the criminal threatening statute
H-0446 relative to the right to brandish a firearm in defense of one's property.
S-0453 relative to the brandishing of a firearm
H-0495 relative to the return of personal property by law enforcement agencies
H-0498 relative to the advisory board on private investigative agencies and security services, and firearms proficiency for armed security guards, private investigators, and bail enforcement agents.
H-0540 making various changes to the fish and game laws
H-0567 requiring law enforcement agencies to take proper care of firearms seized pursuant to a domestic violence order for relief
H-0601 repealing the prohibition on having or carrying certain crossbow, rifles, or shotguns in vehicles
H-0602 relative to the use of deadly force to protect oneself
H-0640 relative to special permits for transportation of deer
H-0641 prohibiting night vision enhancement equipment in night hunting
H-0642 instituting an apprentice hunting license
H-0643 relative to the certificates of completion of a basic hunter education program or bow hunter education
H-0655 relative to the right to possess a firearm in one's personal motor vehicle
H-0709 relative to the right to carry a firearm, openly or concealed, without a license
H-0848 relative to goods and services sold, made and retained in the state
H-0896 relative to a waiting period before conducting post-shooting investigative interviews of police involved in a shooting
S-0921 repealing the prohibition on the unauthorized use of firearms and firecrackers in the compact part of a town


http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. This has to do with jurisdiction... Congress uses the "interstate commerce law" to regulate guns...
Edited on Mon Feb-21-11 02:35 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
Looks like congress does not have constitutionally granted power to regulate a gun manufactured, sold, and used within a single state.

Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Only until one or two
said guns cross into another sovereign state. Then all bets are off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. SCOTUS allowed regulation of a single privately owned pot plant in California.
They apply Interstate Commerce to whatever the hell they republicans want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Only if it goes interstate which allows the Commerce Clause to be invoked
Edited on Mon Feb-21-11 02:47 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
It is also not the only state doing this.

Yup yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC