Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Slight Variation on the Generic Gungeon Assault Weapon Thread.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:29 PM
Original message
A Slight Variation on the Generic Gungeon Assault Weapon Thread.
I'd like to direct this one to those here who are fully in favor of extending the current "assault weapon" ban.

Assuming complete renewal...that is, no semi-automatic (one shot per trigger pull) weapon may have more than one of the following features:

- Pistol grip
- Bayonet lug
- Collapsible or folding stock
- Grenade launcher
- Threaded barrel
- Flash suppressor

In your opinion, what would be the next step in attaining "gun control"? What federal gun law would you pass next?

Please be as specific as possible and explain why you feel such a law would be effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would change the
minimum barrel length for rifles from 16" back to the 18" it was originally. I'd give a two month amnesty where anyone could register their now short barreled rifles for free. No one needs a 16" barrel. They're too easily concealable or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wild Bill Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. easily concealable?
You still have a law in regards to overall length. 26 inch minimum overall length. Only a Shaq size person could hide a 26 Inch rifle on their person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. LALALALALA
I can't hear you. </gun grabber>

Well if I were a gun grabber that's the law I'd pass. Fortunately all the real gun grabbers seem to care about are flash suppressors and bayonet lugs.

Just think, if they passed my law, how many hundreds of thousands of rifles would have to be registered? Hell it might be in the millions. There's always some gun grabber down here pissing and moaning about "why shouldn't guns be registered?" Well, here's their chance.

Hmm. Probably would crash ATF's computer system, better include a funding increase for them so they can upgrade their computers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I like my Model 1894 .44 mag carbine.
16 inch rifle shooting big bore pistol ammo. Great for wild boar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Soon to be a short barreled rifle
if any of the gun grabber groups hire me as an adviser. No legitimate civilian purpose and all of that. Better register it during the amnesty or you'll have to pay a $200 tax assuming we even allow people to legally register them after the amnesty. Clearly that rifle was manufactured before the law was passed. If you choose not to take advantage of the amnesty, why should we allow you to register it afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. "cop killer" bullet ban
any rifle or handgun cartridge that can pierce a "bullet proof" vest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What kind of bullet proof vest?
That is to say, a bullet proof vest of what rating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Doesn't matter what rating.
Any centerfire rifle hunting ammunition will rip right through even heavy police body armor. If the KE dump doesn't kill or cripple the wearer anyway. Kevlar vests simply can't stop rifle ammunition.

Kennedy was either being an idiot (possible) or was deliberately trying to poison-pill that gun maker immunity bill.
~

And whoever said that longer barrel=less velocity, that's just dead wrong. Up to any practical rifle barrel length, it *increases* velocity due to the greater amount of gas (powder burn) that is captured in propelling the bullet down the gun rather than just blasted out into the air at the end of a short barrel.

There's a reason my Model 1894 Winchester .44 mag is a great deal deadlier than any .44 mag pistol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Well he was talking about rifle and pistol ammo.
.44 magnum is probably out of luck either way since it wouldn't be fair to test it out of a pistol when there are rifles available that fire the same round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Most hunting ammunition can penetrate standard police body armor.
Would your proposed "vest buster" law also apply to hunting calibers that existed long before Kevlar did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Senator Kennedy proposed this ban
the Kennedy Amendment to S.1805
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbnd45 Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Speaking of body armor,
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 11:03 PM by mbnd45
After banning "cop killer" bullets, we should ban body armor sales to civilians, because cops are the only people in danger of being shot. Besides, body armor in the hands of civilians will only lead to an arms race. And hollow point ammunition should also be banned, because we all know how effective they are against body armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Let's keep the sarcasm to a minimum.
With all the hubbub the anti-gun people like to give the "assault weapon" ban, I really want to know what type of legislation they'd like to see passed next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Easy
Edited on Mon Jul-19-04 12:17 AM by Columbia
Just make it so you can't have any of the features listed above at all for semi-autos with detachable mags (California styple). After that, prohibit detachable mags completely. Tax each round of ammo a quarter each. Ban reloading supplies and equipment. Then stop further civilian sales and transfers for weapons with no grandfather clause. Once every civilian gun owner dies... voila, no more guns (legally anyway).

Edit to add:

Really, the trick is to make owning a gun so cumbersome and complex as to discourage and vilify gun ownership to the point that it is reduced to a level small enough to easily marginalize away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Several
Minimum barrel length of 20".( due to conceal ability and velocity lose.)
Fixed magazine capacity of 4 rounds.( Never needed more than that.)
Caliber restrictions, on rifles. ( eliminates the 7.62- 39, a very weak and inefficient round.)

To be honest, i would eliminate all center fire, semi-autos. I've carried revolvers for years and never felt under gunned.

The other day i had coffee with the Chief of Police. He had just looked at some stats comparing shots fired, in officer involved shootings.
Revolvers- 2.7 rounds per incident
Autos - 8. rounds per incident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Hey you're not bad at this.
"Minimum barrel length of 20".( due to conceal ability and velocity lose.)"

I was going to start by raising minimum barrel length to 18" first and raise it to 20" later. Probably less resistance if you go 2" at a time. Why offer velocity loss as a reason though? Less velocity means less deadly. If you want the brainless masses to follow you you probably shouldn't point that out. Stick to the concealability part, even though just between us we know it's bullshit too. ;)


Fixed magazine capacity of 4 rounds.( Never needed more than that.)

That'd be a real kicker. You might have to save that one for later though or flesh it out a bit since there's going to be some serious resistance to that one. Hell you can buy bolt actions with removable magazines with a 5 or more round capacity.

"Caliber restrictions, on rifles. ( eliminates the 7.62- 39, a very weak and inefficient round.)"

No. No. No. Don't call it a very weak and inefficient round. No one is going to want to ban weak and inefficient rounds. Call it armor piercing or military-style or something. Point out how it will go through both sides of a "bullet proof" vest, just don't go to mentioning what rating vest or anything like that.



"The other day i had coffee with the Chief of Police. He had just looked at some stats comparing shots fired, in officer involved shootings.
Revolvers- 2.7 rounds per incident
Autos - 8. rounds per incident"


Yes, the police can't shoot. It's been mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Way I Figure It....
...if so many pro-gunners are opposed to the current AWB law, it must be pretty good. So it should remain as is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Cogent arguement...
...not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dolomite Donating Member (689 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Any of these would be the next logical step:
Edited on Mon Jul-19-04 10:34 AM by Dolomite
(ETA: Be advised - I'm against the AWB renewal FWIW)


1) requiring that magazines over 10 rounds be serialized and eventually registered

2) or, like CA did with the SKS model that could take AK mags, require that these so-called Assault Weapons be registered with the ATF (give "them" 1 year to register their firearms, call it amnesty if you want, tell "them" that you're not really going to take away their guns - that this database is for the children, etc...)

3) require a special permit (after receiving of course a lengthy Fed background check and written approval of the local Sheriff or Chief of Po-po) for civilians to purchase "Military & Police" caliber ammunition - this would start with the 5.56 (.223 Remington) and the 7.62x51(.308 Winchester) - and then eventually include all pistol cartridges including (you guessed it) the .22LR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 11:58 AM
Original message
Dupe
Edited on Mon Jul-19-04 12:28 PM by slackmaster
sTUTTER-cLICKED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The SKS seizure in CA has never materialized
Because people who registered them have correspondence from the DoJ verifying that they are in compliance with the law, the state would have an evidenciary problem (entrapment???) if it actually went through with a systematic confiscation.

Most people never bothered to register them anyway. I believe a large number of those rifles are quietly gathering dust in closets and attics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is just what I expected when you posted this question.
The regular anti gunners wouldn't respond to the question.

If they can't answer with racist, blood money, NRA or some other recycled term, they won't bother. Tells me they don't have any proposed answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. I just want existing laws enforced
No need to create new ones when so few of the old are enforced.

Did I get that right?

Then, later, I'll make sure and complain that there are currently too many laws on the books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Are the current laws not enforced? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. A post I have read many times in the Gungeon
We don't need anymore gun laws - they need to enforce the ones we have. I doubt you get the NRA talking points memos, Feeb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well I just have to pretend I don't.
"I doubt you get the NRA talking points memos, Feeb."

Everyone knows the NRA is paying me to post on DU and spread my lies about the AWB having nothing to do with machine guns.

I suspect they're referring to the hundreds of thousands (is it millions yet?) of people who have been denied by NICS and never been prosecuted for being a convicted felon trying to buy a gun. That is, if I had to take a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hmm, wonder if that is why
gun deaths are decreasing? All those folks who locally are denied purchases?

But, actually, I don't think that is the point others have made - I believe said point is a straw man to throw blame back on law enforcement and those damn activist liberal judges rather than accept that not every individual is safe with a gun.

Damn, I misjudged you - all this time I thought you were a gunless gunhugger, simply doing the hard work of changing minds and charming hearts out of the goodness deep down in your soul. Guess now I know where all those NRA dues go - Feeb gets his share to be a on-line "grass-rooter".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. The real truth
is that I own more machine guns than Dick Cheney. I pay for my habit with the proceeds I get from the NRA from pretending to be a tireless defender of gun rights who doesn't actually own guns. It's a surprisingly lucrative job. You didn't think all those NRA dues went to lining Republican Congressmen's pockets did you?

I expect most people who are denied purchase shouldn't actually have been denied and later get a gun after things get sorted out. I have my doubts that there are hundreds of thousands of felons out there who are dumb enough to try and pass a background check to buy a gun that they are forbidden by law from owning.

I don't believe I've ever seen anyone on this forum make the claim that every individual is safe with a gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Well, I know I have seen the claim before
But I am certain never from one of our regular contributors - though now all of you are suspect since we know now that you are all nothing but paid NRA stooges. It was not a fair tactic to in effect paint the RKBAers with such a wide brush - I apologize.

I know locally we have a lot of folks who get denied access to weapons due to their mental health status. I would assume that comes into play in some of the accounting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. What do you need...
to shoot that cannot be done with a .30 caliber or smaller bullet?

Yeah, no firearms over .30 (7.62) cal.

And no military rounds--.30-06, .308, .223 Rem., 7.62x39, 12 gauge.
Join the army if you want to shoot those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Shouldn't no military rounds include pistol rounds too?
Heck you could get rid of most of the handguns in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Later, Feeb...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC