OpSomBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 09:29 PM
Original message |
A Slight Variation on the Generic Gungeon Assault Weapon Thread. |
|
I'd like to direct this one to those here who are fully in favor of extending the current "assault weapon" ban.
Assuming complete renewal...that is, no semi-automatic (one shot per trigger pull) weapon may have more than one of the following features:
- Pistol grip - Bayonet lug - Collapsible or folding stock - Grenade launcher - Threaded barrel - Flash suppressor
In your opinion, what would be the next step in attaining "gun control"? What federal gun law would you pass next?
Please be as specific as possible and explain why you feel such a law would be effective.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
minimum barrel length for rifles from 16" back to the 18" it was originally. I'd give a two month amnesty where anyone could register their now short barreled rifles for free. No one needs a 16" barrel. They're too easily concealable or something.
|
Wild Bill
(104 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
You still have a law in regards to overall length. 26 inch minimum overall length. Only a Shaq size person could hide a 26 Inch rifle on their person.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
I can't hear you. </gun grabber>
Well if I were a gun grabber that's the law I'd pass. Fortunately all the real gun grabbers seem to care about are flash suppressors and bayonet lugs.
Just think, if they passed my law, how many hundreds of thousands of rifles would have to be registered? Hell it might be in the millions. There's always some gun grabber down here pissing and moaning about "why shouldn't guns be registered?" Well, here's their chance.
Hmm. Probably would crash ATF's computer system, better include a funding increase for them so they can upgrade their computers.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
17. I like my Model 1894 .44 mag carbine. |
|
16 inch rifle shooting big bore pistol ammo. Great for wild boar.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Soon to be a short barreled rifle |
|
if any of the gun grabber groups hire me as an adviser. No legitimate civilian purpose and all of that. Better register it during the amnesty or you'll have to pay a $200 tax assuming we even allow people to legally register them after the amnesty. Clearly that rifle was manufactured before the law was passed. If you choose not to take advantage of the amnesty, why should we allow you to register it afterward.
|
Mr.Green93
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
2. "cop killer" bullet ban |
|
any rifle or handgun cartridge that can pierce a "bullet proof" vest.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. What kind of bullet proof vest? |
|
That is to say, a bullet proof vest of what rating?
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
18. Doesn't matter what rating. |
|
Any centerfire rifle hunting ammunition will rip right through even heavy police body armor. If the KE dump doesn't kill or cripple the wearer anyway. Kevlar vests simply can't stop rifle ammunition.
Kennedy was either being an idiot (possible) or was deliberately trying to poison-pill that gun maker immunity bill. ~
And whoever said that longer barrel=less velocity, that's just dead wrong. Up to any practical rifle barrel length, it *increases* velocity due to the greater amount of gas (powder burn) that is captured in propelling the bullet down the gun rather than just blasted out into the air at the end of a short barrel.
There's a reason my Model 1894 Winchester .44 mag is a great deal deadlier than any .44 mag pistol.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. Well he was talking about rifle and pistol ammo. |
|
.44 magnum is probably out of luck either way since it wouldn't be fair to test it out of a pistol when there are rifles available that fire the same round.
|
OpSomBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Most hunting ammunition can penetrate standard police body armor. |
|
Would your proposed "vest buster" law also apply to hunting calibers that existed long before Kevlar did?
|
Mr.Green93
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Senator Kennedy proposed this ban |
|
the Kennedy Amendment to S.1805
|
mbnd45
(43 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Speaking of body armor, |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-18-04 11:03 PM by mbnd45
After banning "cop killer" bullets, we should ban body armor sales to civilians, because cops are the only people in danger of being shot. Besides, body armor in the hands of civilians will only lead to an arms race. And hollow point ammunition should also be banned, because we all know how effective they are against body armor.
|
OpSomBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-18-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Let's keep the sarcasm to a minimum. |
|
With all the hubbub the anti-gun people like to give the "assault weapon" ban, I really want to know what type of legislation they'd like to see passed next.
|
Columbia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-19-04 12:17 AM by Columbia
Just make it so you can't have any of the features listed above at all for semi-autos with detachable mags (California styple). After that, prohibit detachable mags completely. Tax each round of ammo a quarter each. Ban reloading supplies and equipment. Then stop further civilian sales and transfers for weapons with no grandfather clause. Once every civilian gun owner dies... voila, no more guns (legally anyway).
Edit to add:
Really, the trick is to make owning a gun so cumbersome and complex as to discourage and vilify gun ownership to the point that it is reduced to a level small enough to easily marginalize away.
|
TX-RAT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Minimum barrel length of 20".( due to conceal ability and velocity lose.) Fixed magazine capacity of 4 rounds.( Never needed more than that.) Caliber restrictions, on rifles. ( eliminates the 7.62- 39, a very weak and inefficient round.)
To be honest, i would eliminate all center fire, semi-autos. I've carried revolvers for years and never felt under gunned.
The other day i had coffee with the Chief of Police. He had just looked at some stats comparing shots fired, in officer involved shootings. Revolvers- 2.7 rounds per incident Autos - 8. rounds per incident
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Hey you're not bad at this. |
|
"Minimum barrel length of 20".( due to conceal ability and velocity lose.)"
I was going to start by raising minimum barrel length to 18" first and raise it to 20" later. Probably less resistance if you go 2" at a time. Why offer velocity loss as a reason though? Less velocity means less deadly. If you want the brainless masses to follow you you probably shouldn't point that out. Stick to the concealability part, even though just between us we know it's bullshit too. ;)
Fixed magazine capacity of 4 rounds.( Never needed more than that.)
That'd be a real kicker. You might have to save that one for later though or flesh it out a bit since there's going to be some serious resistance to that one. Hell you can buy bolt actions with removable magazines with a 5 or more round capacity.
"Caliber restrictions, on rifles. ( eliminates the 7.62- 39, a very weak and inefficient round.)"
No. No. No. Don't call it a very weak and inefficient round. No one is going to want to ban weak and inefficient rounds. Call it armor piercing or military-style or something. Point out how it will go through both sides of a "bullet proof" vest, just don't go to mentioning what rating vest or anything like that.
"The other day i had coffee with the Chief of Police. He had just looked at some stats comparing shots fired, in officer involved shootings. Revolvers- 2.7 rounds per incident Autos - 8. rounds per incident"
Yes, the police can't shoot. It's been mentioned.
|
CO Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
10. The Way I Figure It.... |
|
...if so many pro-gunners are opposed to the current AWB law, it must be pretty good. So it should remain as is.
|
RoeBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
Dolomite
(689 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Any of these would be the next logical step: |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-19-04 10:34 AM by Dolomite
(ETA: Be advised - I'm against the AWB renewal FWIW)
1) requiring that magazines over 10 rounds be serialized and eventually registered
2) or, like CA did with the SKS model that could take AK mags, require that these so-called Assault Weapons be registered with the ATF (give "them" 1 year to register their firearms, call it amnesty if you want, tell "them" that you're not really going to take away their guns - that this database is for the children, etc...)
3) require a special permit (after receiving of course a lengthy Fed background check and written approval of the local Sheriff or Chief of Po-po) for civilians to purchase "Military & Police" caliber ammunition - this would start with the 5.56 (.223 Remington) and the 7.62x51(.308 Winchester) - and then eventually include all pistol cartridges including (you guessed it) the .22LR
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 11:58 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-19-04 12:28 PM by slackmaster
sTUTTER-cLICKED.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. The SKS seizure in CA has never materialized |
|
Because people who registered them have correspondence from the DoJ verifying that they are in compliance with the law, the state would have an evidenciary problem (entrapment???) if it actually went through with a systematic confiscation.
Most people never bothered to register them anyway. I believe a large number of those rifles are quietly gathering dust in closets and attics.
|
Township75
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
16. This is just what I expected when you posted this question. |
|
The regular anti gunners wouldn't respond to the question.
If they can't answer with racist, blood money, NRA or some other recycled term, they won't bother. Tells me they don't have any proposed answers.
|
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I just want existing laws enforced |
|
No need to create new ones when so few of the old are enforced.
Did I get that right?
Then, later, I'll make sure and complain that there are currently too many laws on the books.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Are the current laws not enforced? (nt) |
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. A post I have read many times in the Gungeon |
|
We don't need anymore gun laws - they need to enforce the ones we have. I doubt you get the NRA talking points memos, Feeb.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Well I just have to pretend I don't. |
|
"I doubt you get the NRA talking points memos, Feeb."
Everyone knows the NRA is paying me to post on DU and spread my lies about the AWB having nothing to do with machine guns.
I suspect they're referring to the hundreds of thousands (is it millions yet?) of people who have been denied by NICS and never been prosecuted for being a convicted felon trying to buy a gun. That is, if I had to take a guess.
|
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Hmm, wonder if that is why |
|
gun deaths are decreasing? All those folks who locally are denied purchases?
But, actually, I don't think that is the point others have made - I believe said point is a straw man to throw blame back on law enforcement and those damn activist liberal judges rather than accept that not every individual is safe with a gun.
Damn, I misjudged you - all this time I thought you were a gunless gunhugger, simply doing the hard work of changing minds and charming hearts out of the goodness deep down in your soul. Guess now I know where all those NRA dues go - Feeb gets his share to be a on-line "grass-rooter".
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
is that I own more machine guns than Dick Cheney. I pay for my habit with the proceeds I get from the NRA from pretending to be a tireless defender of gun rights who doesn't actually own guns. It's a surprisingly lucrative job. You didn't think all those NRA dues went to lining Republican Congressmen's pockets did you?
I expect most people who are denied purchase shouldn't actually have been denied and later get a gun after things get sorted out. I have my doubts that there are hundreds of thousands of felons out there who are dumb enough to try and pass a background check to buy a gun that they are forbidden by law from owning.
I don't believe I've ever seen anyone on this forum make the claim that every individual is safe with a gun.
|
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Well, I know I have seen the claim before |
|
But I am certain never from one of our regular contributors - though now all of you are suspect since we know now that you are all nothing but paid NRA stooges. It was not a fair tactic to in effect paint the RKBAers with such a wide brush - I apologize.
I know locally we have a lot of folks who get denied access to weapons due to their mental health status. I would assume that comes into play in some of the accounting.
|
MrSandman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
to shoot that cannot be done with a .30 caliber or smaller bullet?
Yeah, no firearms over .30 (7.62) cal.
And no military rounds--.30-06, .308, .223 Rem., 7.62x39, 12 gauge. Join the army if you want to shoot those.
|
FeebMaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. Shouldn't no military rounds include pistol rounds too? |
|
Heck you could get rid of most of the handguns in the country.
|
MrSandman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-19-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |