Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fighting Jim Crow in Israel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:12 PM
Original message
Fighting Jim Crow in Israel
By Mike Whitney
Online Journal Contributing Writer

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1100.shtml

<snip>

Israel calls itself a democracy, but its prevailing ethos of Zionism precludes an evenhanded application of the law. This explains why Zionism was denounced in United Nations Resolution 3379 (vote 72 to 35) in 1975 which stated: “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”

The resolution has since been repealed due to the persistent efforts of the US, but the effects are not so easily erased.

There cannot be a second set of laws for minorities; that is racism pure and simple.

The abhorrent treatment of Palestinians is the most striking example of Israeli chauvinism, but the current aggression in Lebanon is equally revealing. The massive ethnic cleansing of 750,000 mostly poor Shia Muslims in the south of Lebanon carries the same racist overtones as Israel’s conduct in the occupied territories...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Zionism isn't a form of racism then I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What is your definition of
Zionism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Those in favor of redrawing the borders to become Ersatz Israel
taking over the lands of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, etc.

One could also call them Israeli Expansionists, which is the term I generally prefer, as it's less ambiguous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. So you're against essentially a null set? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. ?????
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 04:13 AM by pelsar
so what does one call this?.....

can i be blunt? call the posters ignorent of israeli society?...wonder why they are, what makes people not want to know simple truths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but Israel cannot be "unfounded"
Israel exists as long as Jews are a majority in the country. It's nature changes the second Muslims achieve parity or even outnumber Jews. It would no longer be "Israel." It would be called "Palestine" instead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So, Israeli Arabs shouldn't
be given the same rights and freedoms as "legitimate" Israelis, is that what you're saying? If that's the case, then Israel has no right to call itself democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'm not justifying any of that
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 11:45 PM by Selatius
What I am saying is that Israel, as a matter of national policy, determines who can or cannot live in the borders of Israel. If they simply allowed anybody who applied to enter the country, then it is likely the Jewish nature of Israel would be lost. As long as Israeli Arabs remain a minority in the country, the Jewish nature of the country is assured. To do this requires that one have very strict laws on Arabs being able to apply for citizenship and strict laws governing Israeli Arabs who may decide to marry fellow Palestinian Arabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's creepy, isn't it?
Good thing is, it gives Israel impetus to jettison arab dominated areas that they have occupied.

There was a story I read where Israeli arabs are out breeding Jews & will be the majority within 20 years or so.

Since it is obvious to people like you that Israel will not exist with an Arab majority, it is clear to me that motives for any action they take must always be suspect IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. arab majority
will only occur if israel keeps the west bank and gaza.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. the rank and file left is beginning to learn that Israel is NOT...
...America's friend, even as the fundy right wing embraces Zionist racism for all its worth in hopes of hastening the biblical apocalypse it awaits. Israel's best friends in the U.S. include neocon politicians who alternately want to use Israel as an attack dog in the middle east and as a model for running a garrison state, and rabid christian extremists who view total war in the middle east as a necessary prerequisite to the rapture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Agreed. Neocons are no friend to Israel...
...although they are avid cheerleaders for their militarism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The non-Jewish neocons are
incredibly anti-semitic. The only reason they care so much about Israel is due to their apocalyptic biblical vision of Israel's role in armageddon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlavaKreemSnak Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. They are worried about the ethnic purity of Israel

I have read some articles about it, and they don't consider it racism, the ones who are in favor of it are worried that Israel will not have enough ethnic purity. Some of the article writers are concerned because they think Arabs have too many babies, and the European Israelis can't keep up. It is one of those things that Americans would probably consider racism but because it is Israel people will tell you that it is different, because to not have unconditional support for Israel is considered to be sympathizing with terrorists and also anti-Semitic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntiRaymi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Demographics are like tectonic plates shifting.
Make people wealthy, they stop having babies. It's as close to a sociological truth as things can get - I would opine that it ranks up there with Marx's dialectic materialism. The solution to the problem of people wanting a life of their own, is to establish institutionalized racism.
I think that it is incredibly illuminating that the people in the USA that support Israel's policies, in an unquestioning manner, are the bleating sheep that obey Mike Savage and Rush Limbaugh's exhortations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Grossman family lost a son
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2454767#2454937

His bereaved father, a peace activist, clearly spells it out:

"We have only the emotional dictionary of hatred."
Quote from the interview:

GROSSMAN: First...the first thing that we should do when we have this peace treaty between us and the Palestinians is to change the study programs, is to change the textbooks, is to teach both peoples from childhood to live in life of...to live life of mutuality, of respecting the other. It is very difficult. It will be like teaching them a totally new language, because you see, we were born to these wars, to this violence. It is engraved in our genes. We forgot totally this language. We have only the emotional dictionary of hatred. And this must be changed, and therefore I do not believe that we shall see a real internalized change in the nearest future. It will take many generations to start to purify us on this poison of 100 years of killing each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I think he's right. Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC