Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palestinian Deal Troubles U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 07:48 PM
Original message
Palestinian Deal Troubles U.S.
(02-08) 16:15 PST WASHINGTON, (AP) --

A power-sharing deal between the secular, U.S.-backed Palestinian leader and his Islamic militant rivals complicates an emerging U.S. effort to invigorate dormant peace prospects with Israel.

The deal announced Thursday between warring Palestinian factions does not expressly commit the new government to conditions the United States has called essential first steps toward any political accommodation between Israel and the Palestinians.

The Bush administration said little in public about the agreement, but officials were troubled at the prospect of a unified Palestinian government that will not renounce violence or recognize Israel.

"We're going to have to see," said White House press secretary Tony Snow. "At this juncture they are very preliminary reports and we have not had any opportunity to study what may have been worked out there."

---snip---

Indyk raised the possibility of a U.S. split with Russia and Europe. At a news conference with Rice last week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov made a point of expressing opposition to international isolation of Hamas.

Russia and European nations "may now say, 'This is what the Palestinians have produced, now we have to work with them,'" Indyk said.

---end of excerpt--

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/02/08/national/w161541S67.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quick, peace! Stomp it! Stomp it fast!!
Can't let it spread!!

(Slight caricature of the reaction of the US government)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. this doesn't sound like peace at all
"...a unified Palestinian government that will not renounce violence or recognize Israel."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. or visa versa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. America is not for peace in the Middle East, but for the status quo
Worse yet, the Bush regime is totally opposed to anything that goes beyond a photo op. How many hours has Bush 43 spent on Middle East peace efforts in the last 6 years? I think that if we can count more than 10 minutes, that's too many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. ANALYSIS: New PA government creates a real problem for Israel
<snip>

"The new Palestinian unity government creates a real problem for Israel. It will be headed by a senior Hamas figure, Ismail Haniyeh. Moreover, it will not recognize Israel and does not pretend to meet the Quartet's conditions, as one Hamas leader said.

Yet the same time, it is not a Hamas government, and Hamas will not have a majority in the cabinet. The finance minister-designate, Salem Fayad, is the White House's darling. The foreign minister-designate, academic Ziad Abu Amar, has lectured at many American universities and does not have extremist positions on Israel. And the interior minister, who commands the security forces, will be an independent rather than a Hamas member, though he will be appointed on Hamas' recommendation.

Under these circumstances, Israel and the U.S. will have trouble demanding that the international economic boycott of the Palestinian government remain in place.

The other members of the Quartet - the European Union, the United Nations and Russia - have been annoyed for some time by Washington's opposition to a unity government, and once one is in place, in another few weeks, some or all of these parties are liable to announce the resumption of relations with the Palestinian Authority."

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Russia welcomes Mecca deal, urges lifting freeze
<snip>

"Russia on Friday welcomed an agreement by rival Palestinian factions to form a unity government and appealed for the lifting of a freeze on direct aid to the Palestinian government.

Hamas and its rival movement Fatah signed a deal earlier this week to end factional violence and form a coalition.

"We think the future Palestinian national government ... will be an important factor in the process of reviving Israeli-Palestinian talks," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

"We also believe the implementation of Mecca agreements should be combined with lifting a blockade of the Palestinian territories which has inflicted suffering and hardship on the people."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/823843.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC