Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Speaks to AIPAC lobbyists in Chicago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:00 PM
Original message
Obama Speaks to AIPAC lobbyists in Chicago
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 05:17 PM by Dover
Obama to offer pro-Israel views at Chicago gathering

March 1, 2007
BY LYNN SWEET Sun-Times Columnist

For the first time since becoming a senator -- much less a White House hopeful -- Barack Obama on Friday will talk in depth about U.S. policy toward Israel and the Mideast.
The story behind the story of Obama's appearance before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's regional forum at the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers provides insight into the Obama presidential operation.

AIPAC, whose sole interest is U.S.-Israel relations, is one of the most influential lobbying groups in the nation. Its annual policy conference starts March 11 in Washington. The gathering provides fertile territory for Obama to schmooze with well-connected backers and donors. Though no 2008 presidential candidates are on the program, Obama is hosting a reception for AIPAC members -- as is archrival Hillary Rodham Clinton...cont'd

http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/278222,CST-EDT-sweet01.article

___________________________________________________________________________


Obama: US Must Have Total Commitment To Israel, Attack Iran If Necessary
Added: Mar 7th, 2007 9:14 AM

Obama: US should never dictate what's best for Israel

In speech delivered before AIPAC lobbyists in Chicago, US Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama reveals strongly pro-Israel platform: US must preserve ‘total commitment to unique defense relationship with Israel’, work to stop Iran’s nuclear program even if military action is necessary

Yitzhak Benhorin Published: 03.02.07
Israel News

WASHINGTON - In a powerfully pro-Israel speech, Democratic presidential candidate US Senator Barack Obama clarified that Israel and the United States do not have the luxury to ignore the exhortations of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and “no option, including military action, (should be taken) off the table” in the effort to stop Iran's nuclear armament.

Regading the Middle East peace process, Obama declared that Israel should never feel "dragged to or blocked from the negotiating table" by the United States.

Senator Obama appeared Friday in Chicago before an audience of hundreds of lobbyists from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)...cont'd

http://www.raidersnewsnetwork.com/full.php?news=3467


_____________________________________________________________________________________________


In AIPAC speech, Obama repeats support for Israel, peace talks

By Shmuel Rosner
March 05, 2007
Haaretz Correspondent

United States Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama reiterated his support for Israel on Friday, while at the same time calling on the U.S. to make a concerted effort to revive the peace process.

"Our job is to rebuild the road to real peace and lasting security throughout the region," Obama said during a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Chicago. "Our job is to do more than lay out another road map."

"That effort begins with a clear and strong commitment to the security of Israel: Our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy," he added. "That will always be my starting point."

..cont'd

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/832668.html

--------------------------------------------------

Why Obama came last

By Shmuel Rosner
March 07, 2007
Haaretz U.S. correspondent

It's been a week since our first Israel Factor survey, and my initial analysis rightly dealt with the clear winner, Rudy Giuliani. All the while, however, a question about the loser was troubling me: Why was Barack Obama ranked bottom?

Talking to some of the panelists this week, I tried to understand if there was anything significant about the fact that the popular senator from Illinois came last, or if it was just coincidence. I got different answers from different panelists, and, delving into Obama's numbers again, now I think it's time to present some limited conclusions.

..snip..

But, again, why did Obama come last?

I asked around and was told that Jewish activists in the Chicago area tend to think he is pro-Israel in the most sincere way. Some mentioned his trip to Israel, others highlighted his perfect record in the Senate on Israel-related issues. But the panelists still didn't feel they knew enough about him.

It's "the unknown factor," one explained. "What kind of constituency does he bring with him, and how will they influence his positions?"

Another panelist told me that, "we need more time to trust him. Voting for Israel a couple of times doesn't constitute enough of a track record on which to make a more favorable judgment."..cont'd

http://www.raidersnewsnetwork.com/full.php?news=3467
______________________________________________________


His Speech Transcript on CounterPunch

http://www.counterpunch.org/obama03052007.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope he wins
a seat in the Knesset.

Do we have any candidate who will put America first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. OMG HEZ TAWKING TO JOOOOS!!!!11111!!111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Talking to Israel is fine,
Just leave our money here where women and children eat from dumpsters and live on the street. They need it worse than Israel needs another nuke to project/protect itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. BTW was that like
an accusation or something? I fail to see any reference in my post to ethnicity or religion. If so don't be so subtle next time, I am not offended by an accusation that became utterly meaningless due to overexploitation in the attempt to stifle debate.

Besides, I only dislike sun worshipers anyway. We all know they can't be trusted after dusk. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Talking to Jews is one thing. Talking to Zionist thugs is another.
Which pretty much describes AIPAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. AIPAC
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 06:12 PM by BayCityProgressive
is right up there with Halliburton. WHY are politicians from a secular nation supporting religious states in the Middle East??!? I just don't get it. Religion and state never mixes for the good NEVER. Christ, you think we would learn that by now. The funny thing is, I bet most the people in AIPAC support secularism for America, just not for Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Israel is not a religious state.
It's secular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Link correction: Why Obama Came Last
The article: Why Obama Came Last is here -

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=761775
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Locking per I/P guidelines
Thread subject does NOT agree with any of the selected article titles.

Lithos
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC