Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel's democracy and its Arab population

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 09:36 AM
Original message
Israel's democracy and its Arab population
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1254756248106&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

By David Newman



Last week's comments by Minority Affairs Minister Avishay Braverman that the State of Israel should ask forgiveness from its Arab citizens for the way they have been treated during 60 years of statehood, raised, yet again, one of the basic dilemmas facing Israel as a sovereign state - namely how to be a Jewish and democratic state .

It's not easy being a democracy, and it's even more difficult being a democracy when your country is self-defined as an exclusive nation-state. On top of that, it is almost impossible to be a democracy when the country's minority population (the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel) is part of a wider regional conflict in which it identifies (as would be expected) with the political and national aspirations of the neighbors, rather than of the state within which it resides.

It is a dilemma Israel has faced since the day it was established, and it has never really been resolved. How, indeed, can a state define itself as being both Jewish (exclusive) and democratic (inclusive) at the same time? Democracy means a lot more than simply ensuring that everyone has the right to vote and be elected, regardless of ethnic or religious background. Democracy is about the ability of the state to fully integrate each of its citizens into every potential sphere of state activity. This includes equality in development, resource allocation, political appointments, even in achieving the highest office of state power - a whole sphere of activities that, it must be acknowledged, the Arab citizens of Israel do not enjoy.

ONE DOESN'T have to be a radical left-wing activist to pay a visit to any Arab town or village in the country and see how undeveloped these places are in comparison to their Jewish neighbors. The roads, the infrastructure systems and the school facilities are always below par, and it is easy to understand why there is growing resentment among the country's Arab population. And one only has to look at the annual local government data openly published by the Central Bureau of Statistics (and freely available on the government Web sites) to see that the Arab communities receive much fewer resources per capita than any of their Jewish counterparts, even the poor development towns.

It is not easy to understand the rationale behind almost every government policy to allocate fewer resources per capita to Arab citizens. It doesn't make sense and, in the long term, has proved to be totally self-defeating for the state. The younger, more educated elements among the Arab population, who find it almost impossible to enter the job market at the same levels as their Jewish counterparts and who encounter silent discrimination in almost every sphere, have, as a result, become increasingly radicalized in their political opposition to the state on the one hand, and their support for the Palestinian cause on the other.

One of the biggest mistakes was the attempt by the state to create an artificial distinction between Arab citizens of Israel and Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza. Prior to 1948, the Arab-Palestinian population residing between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean had been part of a single ethnic community, and this did not change as a result of the imposition of an artificial boundary drawn up in the Rhodes Armistice Talks.

Subsequently they have undergone separate processes of development, but they remain part and parcel of a single national entity. The sooner we accept their right to define their own identity, the greater the chance that we will be able to accept them for what they are - equal citizens with a minority identity - rather than always suspect them of constituting a fifth column.

The issue of land zoning for settlement expansion is but one of the more acute problems facing the Arab sector. It is ironic that the current Israeli government insists on the right of West Bank settlement expansion to enable internal natural growth of the existing settler population, while the same government does not enact the same principle for Arab citizens, who experience even more rapid internal growth. Their towns (euphemistically called "villages" in most statistical sources, even though they are much larger than equivalent Israeli development towns) are overcrowded and are prevented from growing by strict land-zoning laws. This is in stark contrast to the neighboring Jewish communities, which expand at much lower residential densities.

GIVEN THE context of the ongoing conflict between Arabs and Jews, Israel can justly be proud that it does accord equal political rights to all of its citizens, including those who identify with the Palestinian cause. The fact that an Arab member of Knesset can make a speech negating the very essence of the Jewish state within which he lives may not be comfortable for most ears, but it reflects a high level of freedom of speech that few other countries in similar situations would allow.

But that does not mean that we can expect the Arab-Palestinian citizens of the country to salute a flag, or sing an anthem, that has been designed to characterize and represent the Jewish and Zionist symbols of statehood. We need to be much more realistic in what to expect from the Arab population while demonstrating to them that we believe they can be fully integrated - politically, socially and economically - within every facet of life. If we succeeded in doing that, we would become a much better democracy than we like to think we are already.

This does not mean having to reduce, in any way, the Jewish characteristics and symbols of statehood, the raison d'etre of why the State of Israel was established in the first place. But it does mean recognizing that democracies are judged by their policies toward their minorities and those groups that do not have power, far more than by the simple technicality of whether or not they are able to vote.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shaayecanaan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. The irony is...
that by simple osmosis, Israel has largely become an Arab country, whether or not this is officially acknowledged.

Jewish Israelis eat hommous and tabouleh rather than cholent and gefilte, they increasingly speak Hebrew with an authentic middle-Eastern accent rather than a faux-French accent and salt their speech with Arabic slang. The street culture largely resembles Casablanca or Beirut rather than Warsaw.

A state with a 30% Arab minority is to all intents and purposes a binational state, irrespective of what the official position is.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vegasaurus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. And yet, ask all those Israeli arabs if they want to leave Israel
and go live elsewhere in another Arab state, or a future Palestinian state.

The resounding answer is no.

So, despite the lip service given to the awful life of Israeli Arabs, it is far better, economically and in terms of freedoms and rights, than life in any other Arab country,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. the same was said about Blacks in America
if its so bad here........
perhaps if it is not too much to wrap your head around Israeli Arabs want to change their county just like American Blacks did and are still doing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It was also said about blacks in South Africa
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 08:37 PM by Ken Burch
the "it's for their own good" argument is nothing new. That doesn't mean it isnt condescending, reactionary bullshit, but it is derived from a long-standing bullshit tradition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Would you leave your homeland if you were treated that way?
The fact that their treatment is not bad enough to force them to emigrate is not a defence of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That is not a defense
Firstly, it's their native country; secondly, just because people might be treated worse elsewhere, doesn't make discrimination non-existent or OK.

There's in any case no guarantee that Israeli Arabs would be *able* to go and live in another Arab state; they certainly don't seem that keen on absorbing the Palestinians. Which is very hypocritical of the Arab governments, but does not let Israel off the hook over its own policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. delete (posted in wrong place)
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 11:14 AM by LeftishBrit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Things well get tragic when the Israeli Arabs approach the 50% mark
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 08:18 AM by UndertheOcean
Only because Israeli Jews refuse to fully out-mode the 19th century "Ethnic State" concept. In a place they mostly immigrated to in the late 1800's too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good article
Those concerned about the issue might be interested in such organizations as the New Israel Fund (www.newisraelfund.org ) and the British Shalom Salaam Trust (www.bsst.org.uk ).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC