|
Governments can be opportunistic when it comes to trade deals. Ho-hum.
Looks like some Class A spying was involved in this one (to get the "classified document"). I think it's quite notable that Timerman is Jewish--Argentina's first Jewish Foreign Minister (which the article discloses). So this rules out any possibility that the Argentine government and its leftist president, Cristina Fernandez, are somehow being anti-semitic in considering a freeze on the investigation. This appears to be merely a pragmatic decision having to do with trade advantages and possibly it is also an expression of the general leftist policy in South America of pursuing world peace (which, in our current world, mostly means opposing U.S. war).
Both Lula da Silva, of Brazil, and Hugo Chavez, of Venezuela, made friendly overtures to Iran's president, Ahmedinejad, inviting him to their countries and visiting Iran. Lula went out of his way to try to broker a nuclear materials deal to get Iran off the U.S. hit list. Cristina Fernandez is very much in accord with these politicians. They all believe that Latin America requires peace in order to achieve its potential as a democratic and prosperous region.
The second part of the article indicates that the Iranian government has not been accused of the bombings; rather, individual Iranian citizens. Over a hundred people were killed and hundreds injured in the embassy and Jewish community center bombings, in 1992. What the Argentine government would be doing, in exchange for trade deals, is letting the Iranian government off the hook as to extraditing its accused citizens. This would not be a great victory for justice but, again, it's routine for governments--which, in addition to pragmatism about trade, are very reluctant to extradite their citizens.
As to extradition, the article mentions extradition to a "third country," so the thing had already hit snags, but the article doesn't explain the situation very well. For instance, does the Iranian government have control of the accused citizens? It may not. And this would make a request for extradition embarrassing. It's possible the Iranians admitted this, through the mediators, thus Argentina's case was moot anyway. Why there were mediators--especially such high placed ones--the president of Syria--is not explained. I think this may be why. The perps have long since vanished in the haze and the Iranian government cannot produce them. The Iranian government could be complicit (i.e., hiding the perps, or worse, instigated the bombings), but the Argentine government, with a Jewish Foreign Minister, is not acting as if they are.
All in all, I think that what we may have here, in this article, is an attack on Timerman for being Jewish and pursuing a peaceful path with Iran. And the original article and its investigation appears to have been hellbent on sabotaging peaceful relations with Iran. I suspect war profiteers and rightwingnutism in both cases--the Perfil article and this Haaretz article. I haven't read the Perfil article, but the Haaretz article seems like a hit piece. Target: Timerman. Secondary target: Fernandez.
All of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Did the U.S. end trade with Saudi Arabia and Yemen? Boycott them? Push the UN for sanctions? Threaten to invade them? Call them the "Axis of Evil"? Bomb them? Kill tens of thousands of their people? No, indeed. And I would not have wanted the U.S. to do so, because war is not the answer. Israel wants the U.S. to bomb and invade Iran. They think that's the answer for Iran being hostile to Israel. Lula da Silva, Hugo Chavez, Cristina Fernandez and others have another idea: peace. Engage Iran in trade. De-isolate Iran. Roads are hard to build. Start building the road that leads to reduced hostility, more understanding, mutual benefit, mutual safety, the common good. This is a policy that both U.S. and Israeli war profiteers and rightwing powers actively hate. So, someone has tried to put a landmine on the peaceful road, by disclosing this classified document and by rigging the headline with the word "forget." The document apparently says "freeze" (the investigation) not "forget" what happened. "Forget" is a hot political word, of course, related to the Holocaust. The title of the Haaretz article really loads the case.
|