JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 04:04 PM
Original message |
Mubarak calls Sharon, thanks him for Maher visit |
|
Dec. 23, 2003 Mubarak calls Sharon, thanks him for Maher visit
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak telephoned Prime Minister Ariel Sharon Tuesday night to thank him for the "welcome and the successful meetings" held Monday in Israel with his Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher. Officials in the prime minister's office said, "The two leaders discussed ways to advance the diplomatic process in the region. Mubarak emphasized his desire to advance Egyptian relations with Israel and expressed his interest in helping to advance the peace process." (…….) Egyptian daily newspapers carried front-page stories denouncing the incident, along with photographs of a visibly shaken Maher being led through the mosque compound by police and security guards. The semi-official Al-Akhbar carried the headline: "A criminal attack carried out by a group of Palestinians on Ahmed Maher at Al Aqsa Mosque," while the more conservative Al-Ahram blared across its front page: "Ahmed Maher saved from a despicable attack inside Al Aqsa Mosque after peace mission to Israel." Ghassan Charbel, the assistant deputy editor of the London-based daily Al Hayat, wrote in his column that the attack was "a dangerous incident, hard to believe and unbearable." Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa told Egypt's Middle East News Agency while visiting Kuwait on Tuesday that "we are sorry for such an assault, which could never serve Arab interests." Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's office issued a statement Monday denouncing the "irresponsible" attack, pledging that it "will not derail Egypt's efforts to achieve a resumption of Palestinian-Israeli talks, with the effective participation of other peace-loving partners."
Read the rest
|
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Mubarek and Sharon - two constructive leaders, doin' the best they can... |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 04:17 PM by Jim Sagle
to make the world a better place. :thumbsup:
Now if only Arafat would hop aboard the peace train. :-(
|
Aidoneus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. bizarre choice of friends.. |
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Why is that, Aidoneus? |
|
I think it is excellent that they are able to work togetjher to achieve peace. Three cheers for them.
|
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Perhaps because they're both brutal thugs? |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 05:52 PM by Darranar
And Sharon is not working to achieve peace.
|
Muddleoftheroad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. So the fact that Israel can deal with Egypt and Jordan means nothing? |
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Ah...the world turned upside down |
|
Anyone working for peace is now a "brutal thug"?
|
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Mubarak is not a brutal thug because he is working for peace.
Sharon is not working for peace.
|
Come Together
(92 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Sharon and Mubarek are working together; Arafat would be the 3rd wheel here.
|
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 06:00 PM by Darranar
I still don't see how sharon is working for peace.
I don't see building walls on other peoples' lands and refusing to halt the growth of illegal settlements as working for peace.
|
Come Together
(92 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 07:18 PM by Come Together
your message 10 does not agree with your message 7
|
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 08:28 PM by JohnLocke
On post #7, you say they're "both brutal thugs." :wtf: In your later post, #10, you say that only Sharon is a "brutal thug." :wtf:
|
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. No, you misunderstood me... |
|
In post #10, I said that Mubarak is not a brutal thug because he worked for peace; rather, he is a brutal thug for other reasons.
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. What 'other reasons'? |
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
MikeGalos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-24-03 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
19. I think it's rather more appropriate |
|
to state that the people who attacked a man on a peace mission in a place they claim is holy are deserving of the phrase "brutal thugs"
But, hey, I care more for peace than the biographies of the people willing to risk going there.
|
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. That's how peace is built - one bizarre friendship at a time. |
newyorican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 04:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I went all the way to Jerusalem and all I got was this lousey shoe.
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-23-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message |