Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel rerouting barrier - sources

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:37 AM
Original message
Israel rerouting barrier - sources
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel is redrawing the route of its West Bank barrier closer to its borders to ensure Palestinians are not cut off from their lands in keeping with a High Court order, security sources say.

The World Court, the U.N.'s highest judicial arm, branded the barrier illegal and called for its removal in a non-binding opinion last week rejected by Israel and hailed by Palestinians.

Two senior U.S. security envoys were to see Prime Minister Ariel Sharon shortly about the repercussions of the World Court decision, unauthorised Jewish settlement outposts in the West Bank, and his plan to withdraw settlers from occupied Gaza.

An Israeli security source said on Tuesday redrafted Defence Ministry guidelines for the barrier -- a 100-metre (330-foot)-wide swathe of razor-fringed fencing and concrete walls -- would have it run "as close as possible" to the Israeli-West Bank boundary.

The barrier henceforth should not isolate nearby Palestinian farmers from olive and citrus groves or maroon villages in enclaves without free access to essential services like schools and hospitals, markets and West Bank cities, the source said.

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=546417§ion=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CookieD Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good news
It probably won't make people on either fringe happy but it's the right thing to do. The fence must be built and it still may have to cross into the West Bank, but hopefully this will be minimally intrusive and the Paelstinians can be compensated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ex_jew Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why does it "have to cross" into the West Bank ?
Is this a law of nature ? How about if any Israeli who doesn't feel like living outside the wall just picks up and moves back to the fatherland ?

I guess I (along with 14 out 15 justices on the ICJ) am just part of the fringe who believes that you have every right to build a wall on YOUR property, but no right to do so anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CookieD Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hopefully it wouldn't have to
Edited on Tue Jul-13-04 11:57 AM by Cookiedemocrat
But if Israel fairly determines that its fence must cross the Green Line for security purposes, so be it. Israel should be prepared to compensate the Palestinans for any annexed territory.

As I have said again and again, no solution will make everyone happy. There are those who believe the land rights of Palestinian farmers (who sometimes assist terrorists in crossing the border and evading capture) should trump the rights of innocent Arab and Israeli citizens who get blown up on busses. By the same token I am sure Sharon is unhappy that his fence doesn't get to cross over the Green Line for even more security and a possible land grab. Fortunately or unfortunately (depending on your point of view) Israel's Supreme Court won't allow it.

The fence should be erected as close to the Green Line as possible. Security is the paramount consideration. I think the Israeli Supreme Court decision is a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefty_mcduff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. About friggin' time.
Now move the wall *completely* within Israeli borders, and all will be well. Even the most hardened skeptics would have a hard time arguing against it then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC