Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:18 PM
Original message |
Is it possible flight 93 was supposed to hit Building 7? |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-01-06 11:31 PM by Quixote1818
They obviously needed to get rid of building 7 and I doubt they wanted to just "pull it" without a plane hitting it. Thoughts? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uPBAiPn6xM
|
petgoat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 12:41 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's a reasonable hypothesis. nt |
Crim_n al
(139 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Or did they intend to take out the bush-brat plus a bunch of kids, |
|
and that is why he was kept in such an easily targeted location?
After all, surely even bush-brat's own parents would agree that the best possible use for him was a "human" sacrifice to their favourite god, Moloch.
Cheney would have had the position he wanted, and the American people would never have recovered from the shock.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 02:59 AM
Response to Original message |
mirandapriestly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
it was rigged for demolition/explosion and then one of the planes never makes it's mark. It could have been intended to hit (or supposedly hit)wtc7 , then appear to "come out the other side" which would have explained the damage to the bottom half of the towers (with some help in the pyrotechnics department) and people wouldn't have been asking so many pesky questions. I think there was supposed to be an explanation for what happened to the bottom halves of the towers.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. It would have made the scam much cleaner |
|
why was it so far off course?
|
LARED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
6. WTC 7 was 47 stories tall |
|
Exactly how is a large commercial airliners going to impact the building. It was surrounded by lots of other tall buildings.
|
Nozebro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I agree with you. WTC 7 was meant to be blown up, not hit by a plane. |
quicknthedead
(259 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
8. For years I've thought perhaps it was... |
|
But I do not know nor probably ever will.
But if I had to place a bet, I think the odds would be pretty close.
WTC7 was an obvious demolition, a classic if there ever was one. WTC1 & WTC2 were also, but not as obvious as WTC7. Planes hit the twin towers...and they collpased.
{ "nothing" } hit WTC7...and it collapsed. UA Flt 93 never got to its target...whatever it might have been.
Yes, for years I've thought that perhaps WTC7 was its intended target. Why would they prep WTC7 for a controlled demolition AND NOT HAVE AN AIRCRAFT HIT IT?
That seems to be a bigger question in my mind. But like I say, we may never know.
But then again...if we had a new 9/11 investigation, this time one with teeth, maybe we could find out!
|
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-03-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The WTC and the DC operations were run has two separate attacks.
My theory is that Flight 77 and Flight 93 passengers were consolidated into one plane and that plane was crashed into either Indian Lake, PA or the deep blue sea.
|
moodforaday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-03-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
One reason I don't believe those 19 hijackers assisted by OBL did all this by themselves is that anybody considering an attack such as 9-11 would pretty soon realize one thing: the planes are going to be intercepted, diverted, eventually shot down. There is no way US military is going to sit still while the attack is unfolding. And no plane will EVER reach the Pentagon or the White House, because on the internet you can learn in 10 minutes about how they are protected, about NORAD, everything. At this point, if you were planning 9-11, you would conclude this wasn't going to work, that they would never cut through the defense. And you would consider some other course of action. Becuase from the hijacker-in-a-cave point of view, the odds of the attack succeeding were NIL.
But there was no defense. Which is why I'm wearing my tinfoil hat tight.
BUT, there is perhaps another possibility. The attackers did conclude that planes would be instercepted and shot down, so they knew they had to hijack as many airliners as possible to increase the chances of at least one of them getting through. They would have had backup plans. First, try WTC. If that succeeds, try other targets. Maybe flight 93 ran out of targets, or maybe they were trying to figure out which targets were still left - it's anybody's wild guess. They may have commandeered more planes than they expected to.
|
mogster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-03-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
That's more likely than the official story of White House, Nucular reactor and so forth.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message |