Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it possible flight 93 was supposed to hit Building 7?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 11:18 PM
Original message
Is it possible flight 93 was supposed to hit Building 7?
Edited on Wed Nov-01-06 11:31 PM by Quixote1818
They obviously needed to get rid of building 7 and I doubt they wanted to just "pull it" without a plane hitting it.

Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uPBAiPn6xM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a reasonable hypothesis. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crim_n al Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Or did they intend to take out the bush-brat plus a bunch of kids,
and that is why he was kept in such an easily targeted location?

After all, surely even bush-brat's own parents would agree that the best possible use for him was a "human" sacrifice to their favourite god, Moloch.

Cheney would have had the position he wanted, and the American people would never have recovered from the shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. moron likely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. well, it makes sense
it was rigged for demolition/explosion and then one of the planes never makes it's mark. It could have been intended to hit (or supposedly hit)wtc7 , then appear to "come out the other side" which would have explained the damage to the bottom half of the towers (with some help in the pyrotechnics department) and people wouldn't have been asking so many pesky questions. I think there was supposed to be an explanation for what happened to the bottom halves of the towers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It would have made the scam much cleaner
why was it so far off course?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. WTC 7 was 47 stories tall
Exactly how is a large commercial airliners going to impact the building. It was surrounded by lots of other tall buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nozebro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree with you. WTC 7 was meant to be blown up, not hit by a plane.

nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quicknthedead Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. For years I've thought perhaps it was...
But I do not know nor probably ever will.

But if I had to place a bet, I think the odds would be pretty close.

WTC7 was an obvious demolition, a classic if there ever was one. WTC1 & WTC2 were also, but not as obvious as WTC7. Planes hit the twin towers...and they collpased.

{ "nothing" } hit WTC7...and it collapsed.
UA Flt 93 never got to its target...whatever it might have been.

Yes, for years I've thought that perhaps WTC7 was its intended target.
Why would they prep WTC7 for a controlled demolition AND NOT HAVE AN AIRCRAFT HIT IT?

That seems to be a bigger question in my mind.
But like I say, we may never know.

But then again...if we had a new 9/11 investigation, this time one with teeth, maybe we could find out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. No I doubt it
The WTC and the DC operations were run has two separate attacks.

My theory is that Flight 77 and Flight 93 passengers were consolidated into one plane and that plane was crashed into either Indian Lake, PA or the deep blue sea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. May have been backup
One reason I don't believe those 19 hijackers assisted by OBL did all this by themselves is that anybody considering an attack such as 9-11 would pretty soon realize one thing: the planes are going to be intercepted, diverted, eventually shot down. There is no way US military is going to sit still while the attack is unfolding. And no plane will EVER reach the Pentagon or the White House, because on the internet you can learn in 10 minutes about how they are protected, about NORAD, everything. At this point, if you were planning 9-11, you would conclude this wasn't going to work, that they would never cut through the defense. And you would consider some other course of action. Becuase from the hijacker-in-a-cave point of view, the odds of the attack succeeding were NIL.

But there was no defense. Which is why I'm wearing my tinfoil hat tight.

BUT, there is perhaps another possibility. The attackers did conclude that planes would be instercepted and shot down, so they knew they had to hijack as many airliners as possible to increase the chances of at least one of them getting through. They would have had backup plans. First, try WTC. If that succeeds, try other targets. Maybe flight 93 ran out of targets, or maybe they were trying to figure out which targets were still left - it's anybody's wild guess. They may have commandeered more planes than they expected to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bingo!
That's more likely than the official story of White House, Nucular reactor and so forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC