NYC TV Newscasters were Reading from "Terror Scripts"

[CB_Brooklyn]

For my first thread, I will present the following PROOF that WB11 and FOX5 were reading from the same "terror script" on a developing story on live TV.


You'll note that newscasters on WB11 and FOX5 reacted/spoke the same way after the "plane" hit the south tower.

You'll note that NBC4 did NOT have a "plane", but just an explosion in the south tower. You'll notice that NBC4 newscasters did NOT react/speak the same way as WB11 and FOX5 after the south tower explosion.

Also, you'll note that FOX5 blanked out the screen for a split second when they realized the "plane's" plastic nosecone traveled through hundreds of feet of steel and concrete and popped out the other side.


This proves the corporate media was one of the orchestrater's of the 9/11 attacks to scare America into giving away their liberties and to start a so-called "war on terror".



And... now for the video:

http://tinyurl.com/25xylb

[Bolo Boffin]

1. Is this the Killtown video...

...where he says there's no plane in the first clip, but there is?

[CB_Brooklyn]

2. it's not killtown's

Do you see a plane in the NBC4 footage?? I can't find one

[Bolo Boffin]

3. It comes in from the right side of the screen.

All I get when I go there is a quasi-YouTube site with a bunch of girls at a webcam. Do you have a better link?

[CB_Brooklyn]

5. I think it's on youtube too

but they're down for maintenance.

[Bolo Boffin]

7. Well, after going to the poster's View All list...

it's on page two, it's the video I've seen before, and yes, there's a plane in the NBC4 footage. Across the river, there are some white buildings - the plane flies right "through" that area of the screen. The video is very compressed and crappy, but yes, the plane is in that footage.

[jberryhill]

16. There is obviously something streaking in...

right when one of the women says "...when you get up to this high level, uh"... which creates a streak of rippling through the compressed video image cells in the area diagonally up from the upper right corner of the closest tower.

You can't see that?

[Big Pappa]

4. So

the planners of the biggest conspiracy in US history let some nobodies at some small news channel in on the plan? This gets better everyday.

[CB_Brooklyn]

6. the crazier it is....

the more true it is. At least regarding 9/11.

I didn't know the newscasters were in on it until I saw this video a couple weeks ago.

[Bolo Boffin]

8. At what point would it get too crazy for you?

At what point does the number of people required to sustain and carry out this 9/11 conspiracy become absurd to you?

If the number of people in the conspiracy turns out to be over 50% of the earth's population, is it technically a conspiracy anymore?

[MervinFerd]

12. If 50% of the Earth's population know the secret, is it a Conspiracy?

I'd say, yes. That leaves 50% of us in the dark.

"Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you."

[JackRiddler]

17. At the point where there is no longer any danger in the world that anyone

will actually believe it, or take the open case of 9/11 seriously.

Hardline debunkers and "woo-woos" are bedfellows, like the worst bastards in the Kremlin and at the Pentagon 20 years ago. That ScrewLooseChange and Nico Haupt are in love is truly a beautiful and revealing sight.

[The Lone Groover]

9. Whilst the helicopter pictures without a plane are...

...interesting. I don't think there is much to get excited about here.

The helicopter cam is higher and seems further away (depends on zoom) then the static cam.

I don't see "proof", just an anomaly that may have a rational explanation.

As for the "script"... nah. I don't think so.

You'll get laughed at - concentrate on the easier stuff - there's so much of it!

[Bolo Boffin]

10. There is a plane in the helicopter pictures.

It's extremely pixelated, but it's there.

[rman]

21. "You'll get laughed at"

If fear of ridicule is supposed to be a motivator, truth seekers better drop everything.

[rman]

11. Which of those videos is the one with the 'terror script'?

[RovianPlot]

13. The reactions on the news footage seemed very scripted

indeed. When you realize that most "news" is just part of the same corporations that all benefit from the war machine, it becomes easier to accept. Any reasonable person can see from watching the news on 9-11 that they all said similar things and followed a strategy as events developed that does not reconcile itself with what would happen in a real surprise attack.

[MervinFerd]

14. "Any reasonable person" ,"seemed", "would benefit"

Conspiracy Logic in a nutshell.

[RovianPlot]

19. Oh dear, I forgot, the "Islamic Militants did it" conspiracy theory

followers, believe that everything broadcasted by the talking heads is true. Despite the fact there is no proof, but that doesn't matter, because the telly tells you it's true, right? Isn't that really all you have to go on? Perfect for the "powers that be" that such fools exist, but they are becoming more rare.
Sad that on a democratic forum like this there are those that believe that citizen's opinions are "illogical" and that everything reported on Fox and all the other similar stations is fact. See, that is what I meant by "reasonable people", but then you wouldn't get that, now, would you?

[jberryhill]

22. There is a huge difference between

"everything reported on Fox is fact" and saying that there were no airplanes.

[jberryhill]

15. CB Brooklyn, I have a serious question for you....

I want you to watch the channel 4 helicopter footage at full screen.

Right when one of the commentators says, "...when you get up to this high level, uh", I'd like you to focus on the clump of white looking buildings across the river, just off of the upper right corner of the tower closest the camera.

Do you, or do you not see something rippling through there at an angle?

I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that you do not know much about how various video compression algorithms work.

In order to get video to stream online at reasonable resolution and bit rates, there are a lot of compromises that have to be made with video quality. There are a lot of ways of encoding video information to reduce the bit rate. Typically, a video compression algorithm will look for chunks of picture that do not change a whole lot from frame to frame over a sequence of several frames, and will treat large areas of image as an entire chunk having some sort of 'average' value. That's why as the helicopter moves, you'll see that the river has something of a "blocky" texture, while things like contrasting edges do not.

In any event, watch the area around those white buildings right at "...when you get up to this high level, uh" and immediately thereafter, and let me know whether you see anything going on there.

(on edit - someone put a yellow box around it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iic5_SrYZWc but you can see it in CB_Brooklyn's video if you look closely enough)

[CB_Brooklyn]

18. yes, that's already been analyzed.

It's looks more like a missile than anything else. Definitely not a commercial plane. And there were reports from people of missiles. What's your point?

[jberryhill]

20. At that resolution...

...you couldn't distinguish between a missile and a plane.

So you are saying it was a missile, but CG graphics were required on other television signals to replace the missile with a plane.

Is that it?