911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony

[seemslikeadream]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y&eurl=

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/779

Damning testimony by Norman Mineta that unequivocally implicates Dick Cheney in the plane crash into the Pentagon and possibly connects him to the downing of flight 93 in Pennsylvania.

The thing that stands out for me, besides what MR highlighted at WRH and the questions derdy raised at youtube, is that orders were given to take down commercial airlines, to the effect that Mineta was concerned that flight 93 was in fact shot down by our fighters, enough so that he actually consulted with the Pentagon to confirm whether or not that happened.

But, CLEARLY, orders were given NOT TO SHOOT down the flight that crashed into the Pentagon.

The question is WHY WOULD FIGHTERS TARGET 93 and NOT TARGET the flight that crashed into the Pentagon?

The only possible conclusion is that the Pentagon flight was headed for its designated target, whereas flight 93 WAS NOT.

Another thing that's odd is why don't they refer to the flight that hit the Pentagon by its flight number?

Don't they know which plane hit the Pentagon?

[Bolo Boffin]

1. The same old same old same old same old same old same old...

It's not even worth doing this again.

[seemslikeadream]

2. sorry to disappoint you bo

but I'm not going away and I'll post whatever I want to, thanks for the kick

[Bolo Boffin]

3. Of course you will.

And I'll be right here, showing people that it's the same old same old same old same old same old...

:hi:

[seemslikeadream]

4. as you say same old same old

I know I can count on you for that

[astralroamer]

10. Stalwartly Defending the Official Story on 9/11

I'm curious, bolofoffin: did you expend as much energy in opposing the Iraq War and neoconservative scheming in the Bush administration as you have in defending the official story on 9/11?

Most everyone I know, all across the political spectrum, has many questions about 9/11 which they would like to see answered in a satisfactory way, without being dogmatic on the subject one way or the other. They are agnostics, not ideologues or conspiracy zealots.

What accounts for the phenomenon of so-called "progressives" becoming almost exclusively preoccupied with defending the behavior of PNAC neocons like Dick Cheney with regard to 9/11? How curious.

[The Lone Groover]

5. Hey Bolo is first to respond to this thread.

Didn't you have enough last time? You took a hell of a beating.

Mineta makes Cheney a liar.

Mineta shows Flight 77 was being tracked by people other than ATC.

Mineta must be discredited.

He's dangerous.

[Bolo Boffin]

6. Mineta is confused. Mineta admits this.

Take your fantasies someplace else.

[The Lone Groover]

7. No he's not confused.

But you know that.

He says he didn't understand at the time what "do the orders still stand" relates to.

But you have to spin that... I understand Bolo... Mineta is dangerous.

Do you want to take the beating again?

[Bolo Boffin]

8. What does he say the orders refer to?

Mineta reconstructed the events of the day based on that plane being Flight 77. It wasn't. Cheney wasn't even in the bunker when Flight 77 hit. The conversation was about Flight 93.

You might want to leave off the threats of physical violence. I'm not kidding.

[Name removed]

9. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.