9/11 Truth: How Did Those Buildings Come Down?

[seemslikeadream]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cdkyUdVDqM

Sprawling on the fringes of the city
In geometric order
An insulated border
In between the bright lights
And the far unlit unknown

Growing up it all seems so one-sided
Opinions all provided
The future pre-decided
Detached and subdivided
In the mass production zone
Nowhere is the dreamer or the misfit so alone


(Subdivisions)
In the high school halls
In the shopping malls
Conform or be cast out
(Subdivisions)
In the basement bars
In the backs of cars
Be cool or be cast out
Any escape might help disprove the unattractive truth
But the suburbs have no charms to soothe the restless dreams of youth

Drawn like moths we drift into the city
The timeless old attraction
Cruising for the action
Lit up like a firefly
Just to feel the living night

Well some will sell their dreams for small desires
Or lose the race to rats
Get caught in ticking traps
And start to dream of somewhere
To relax their restless flight
Somewhere out of a memory of lighted streets on quiet nights...

(Subdivisions)
In the high school halls
In the shopping malls
Conform or be cast out
(Subdivisions)
In the basement bars
In the backs of cars
Be cool or be cast out
Any escape might help disprove the unattractive truth
But the suburbs have no charms to soothe the restless dreams of youth

[frog92969]

1. Uniquely

Suspiciously
Unusually
Mysteriously
Quickly
Uniformly

"Any escape might help disprove the unattractive truth"

[LARED]

2. Typical Troother nonsense

Don't you ever get tired of posting ridiculous you-tube videos that are designed to misinform lazy people?

[SidDithers]

3. Apparently not...nt

Sid

[seemslikeadream]

5. That is correct but

if you find any discrepancies in the videos just let me know

[SidDithers]

6. So, you agree with all the statements in the video?...

Sid

[seemslikeadream]

7. If you find a statement you'd like to discuss let me know

[SidDithers]

8. OK....

"(September 12, 2001-May 2002): Recovery Workers Find WTC Pulverized to Dust from Collapses"

There was 200,000 tons of structural steel recovered that was not pulverized.

Sid

[seemslikeadream]

9. Could you give me a link to that 200,000 tons?

I'd like to read that first

[SidDithers]

11. The number, and link, are in your source...nt

Sid

[seemslikeadream]

12. Then what is your problem?

I guess I misunderstood you

[SidDithers]

13. My problem is that your own source contradicts itself...nt

Sid

[seemslikeadream]

14. No it does not

"(September 12, 2001-May 2002): Recovery Workers Find WTC Pulverized to Dust from Collapses"

There was 200,000 tons of structural steel recovered that was not pulverized.





Where does it say ALL?

Recovery Workers Find WTC Pulverized to Dust from Collapses"

[SidDithers]

15. Where does it say "some"?...nt

Sid

[seemslikeadream]

16. IT DOES NOT SAY ALL

That's all from me on this question, have another?

[SidDithers]

17. No, I think that's enough...nt

Sid

[LARED]

20. Does it trouble you at all that there are many people that

actually buy into the 9/11 was an inside job because they think videos like that are telling them the truth?

[seemslikeadream]

21. It troubles me so much more that so many people believe the lies told by georgie

[LARED]

24. Fascinating, you are troubled by Bush's actions yet you mimic him -nt

[seemslikeadream]

26. No I do not and by the way I AM NOT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES either

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1528134

What the Little Turd from Crawford said 6 Years Ago Today
The crazy monkey received a briefing from the CIA entitled:

Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the United States



Of course, the dysfunctional ignoramus couldn't connect a dot if our lives depended on it.




The Covered-Up Meeting

By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Monday, October 2, 2006; 1:12 PM

The "State of Denial" in the title of Bob Woodward's new book describes President Bush's ongoing refusal to see the true consequences of the war he launched in Iraq.

But one of the book's most notable revelations suggests that the Bush White House was in another state of denial more than five years ago, this one about the threat of terrorism before September 11, 2001.

If the omniscient narrator of Woodward's book is to be believed, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice waved off warnings that should by any reasonable standard have put the government on high alert for an al-Qaeda attack.

And in what looks like a potential administration cover-up, Rice and the other participants in that meeting apparently never mentioned it to anyone, including investigators for the 9/11 Commission.

SNIP…

And a month later, as Ron Suskind reported in his book, "The One Percent Doctrine," an unnamed CIA briefer flew to Bush's Texas ranch to call the president's attention personally to the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo titled 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.' According to Suskind, Bush heard the briefer out and replied: "All right. You've covered your ass, now."

CONTINUED…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/...




"All right. You've covered your ass, now."

How different our world would be if this gangster had, instead, said” “All right. What can we do about it?”

[LARED]

28. Now your moving the goal posts

You are pointing out a lie by commission. That is different than a lie by omission.

[seemslikeadream]

30. No I AM NOT

I sorry is SD sleeping?

[LARED]

33. Yes you are. I am addressing your willingness to mimic Bush's

use of lies by omission. You changed to subject to Bush's lies of commission. I am NOT accusing you or the video of lying by commission.

[seemslikeadream]

35. Just when do you think SD will wake up?

[LARED]

37. I would be interested in his opinion of your

apparent low ethical standards.

[seemslikeadream]

39. I would not be interested in ANYTHING coming from his mind

but I would be interested in his opinion of your apparent low ethical standards.

[LARED]

41. Care to back up the charge I have low ethical standards? - nt

[seemslikeadream]

43. Care to back up the charge I have low ethical standards?

YOU FIRST

[LARED]

46. Simple - you apparently have no problem using lies by omission

to win people to your side.

[seemslikeadream]

47. That's your opinion with no back up BYE

[LARED]

49. That's not a opinion - your post establishes it as fact. -nt

[seemslikeadream]

51. No sweetie that is your opinion not fact

[LARED]

52. Denial is not a river in Egypt - nt

[wildbilln864]

53. instead it's the state of mind of OCTers. nt

[LARED]

54. Thanks for the kick - nt

[seemslikeadream]

45. SD opinion of low ethical standards?? Mr. spelling B

:rofl:

[seemslikeadream]

4. All the information in the video comes from here

http://www.historycommons.org/


and I believe it is correct

[SidDithers]

10. Most statements are statements of opinion...

not statement of fact. They may or may not be accurate, and certainly can't be disputed. If a witness thinks something looks like a controlled demolition, then how can they be wrong about what they think?

Sid

edit: spelling

[LARED]

18. It may be correct but it is still designed to misinform

It like when Mom say "SLAD is your room clean?"

And you say "yes mom," when in reality you just took all the junk on the floor and stuffed it under the bed.

You do understand lies by omission, yes? The video is a text book case.

[seemslikeadream]

19. You do understand lies by omission, yes? OF COURSE

I've been living through 7 years of the georgie administration, and previous ones as well


Oh so many lies of omission I could not count them all

[LARED]

22. So Bush's lies by ommission provide you with the

justification to do the same thing?

Nice

[seemslikeadream]

23. I did not say that quit putting words in my mouth

[Name removed]

25. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

27. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[LARED]

29. Thanks. but changing the subject will not help your position -nt

[seemslikeadream]

31. Tell SD about that

I thought that tactic was acceptable here

OK for you guys but not for me huh?

[seemslikeadream]

Thanks. but changing the subject will not help your position

With you? Like I really care!

[LARED]

36. I care. Are you such an ideologue that you will use the tactic of

lies by omission to convince people to your side?

[seemslikeadream]

38. I believe you misunderstood me, AGAIN

I don't care what YOU think, singular.

[LARED]

40. I understand completely

1. You will not argue that the video does not employ lies by omission

2. You will not face the fact that you feel justified to use that tactic because the opposition does.

[seemslikeadream]

42. So you misunderstand me AGAIN

I HAVE NO INTENTION OF TAKING ANYTHING YOU POST SERIOUSLY

[LARED]

44. Ignoring this issue will not make it go away - Step out into the light

and admit you made a mistake. You'll feel better.

[seemslikeadream]

48. You are the one making a mistake go ahead admit it you'll feel so much better

[LARED]

50. That mistake would be what? -nt

[Name removed]

34. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[DU GrovelBot]

32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##

==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our third quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!