|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 02:15 PM Original message |
Video: South Tower Coming Down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. OCT detachment from reality begins in 3... 2... 1... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. So you really think they put explosives on every floor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Since you have no conclusive evidence they weren't put into place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 09:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. And you can't, in good faith, rule out the possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Hack you can see the intact corner of the building above the floors where the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. You misunderstand the NIST report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. So the corner columns were strong enough to initially resist collapse.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. But the core columns did resist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:29 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. That spire was the bottom of the core that survived the collapse it was so strong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:31 AM Response to Reply #49 |
64. I believe the spire was as high as Floor 60, maybe just 50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 08:38 AM Response to Reply #32 |
67. The famous picture that Christophera loved so much?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Here's what I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 05:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Why are you so unwilling to admit that the WTC were a unique event? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Let me break it down for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. "For the top section of the tower (the hammer) to not be intact at the bottom... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Alright Mr. Ad Hominem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Point to the ad hominem.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. How would you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Please point to ANY post in which... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. through the remaining 3/4 structural mass - there's one of your problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Ah, well that ends that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Bolo's explanation makes perfect sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. I don't believe you, Winston. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. a few things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Sure man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 03:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. ah, now I remember why I usually don't try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. There's nothing meaningful enough in this post to even respond to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. You do realize that the "pile driver" gains mass with every floor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Do you really not understand Hack's post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I understand that it's bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. How in the fuck do you figure that Hack is wrong??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. If you believe that the top floors acted as a "pile driver" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. It only had to cream one floor at a time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. So says the magical 2 day old paper anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. What is an engineered force? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I'm referring to man-made forces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. People like you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:10 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. People like you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. If you believe that why do you spend all your time in here???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 05:46 AM Response to Reply #52 |
65. Entertainment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Well if the government PAYS people to hang out on Forums like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Why do you think the government would waste time on you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:07 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Hey they send FBI informants to church anti war rallys full of little old ladies.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Yes, to infiltrate and lead astray into illegal actions or goofy theories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Hey the official story is pretty damn goofy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. The real world as in politics, news, culture, entertainment, songs, etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Thats for YOU to find out LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 06:05 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Like I said - no one. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. You can't argue from a position of "know-nothingness" and claim to seek truth. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I don't argue from a position of "know-all-edness", WTF that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:24 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. We're very receptive to your presentation of math that would... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:37 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. So if I don't auto-gobble the OCT like you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 10:34 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Dude...if you claim that the consensus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. There is no fucking consensus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:39 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. If we're so "ignorant"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. *You* have no math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:59 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Dude.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:00 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. No I do not have a two day old paper I can coast on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:04 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Dude....I'm not referring to the Bazant paper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Let's start here; what exactly is "my claim"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:11 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. You claimed the piledriver would NOT gain mass with every floor... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:14 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. No, if read to the next post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:17 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. No, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:15 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Remember this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:21 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. My point was that the big hunk that supposedly started it off at the top wasn't there at the bottom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #55 |
68. Bazant also published in 2008... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Questions about Pissants paper..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
84. you refute your own statement. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Dude....you can't refute the math that shows there was or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. So you claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 10:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Since the truth community has provided no alternative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Well, it must be insofar as you're concerned, otherwise... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:11 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Get a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
50. You just argued it was gaining mass as it desended while ripping apart on the way down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 08:18 AM Response to Reply #50 |
66. Ripping apart does not make mass disappear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 06:47 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. I am saying quite obviously mass is being spewed out the sides in a spectacular manner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. The heavy pieces went straight down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 01:36 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Heres question you may have not considered.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 05:16 AM Response to Reply #80 |
81. But that's my point - you don't need large charges at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Hey I do not KNOW how they did it or even who THEY is thats why I want a new investigation.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 12:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
83. do you have any evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC