|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 09:16 PM Original message |
Wonder Why It’s So Important That Towers Did NOT Have Concrete Cores? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gbwarming (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. I sure would like to see that 1990 video. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. It Was AIred On PBS Nationally-Somebody Taped It-We Need To Ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
44. I don't know if this was made in 1990, but here's link to a PBS video: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 01:18 AM Response to Reply #44 |
55. I Just Noticed Your Post. There's So Much Baseless Denial Trash On This T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. I wonder how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeannicot (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 08:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Oh my god, you are being rational |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 09:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Sorry, I'll stop immediately (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Tell that to CNN who on 9/12/01 said WTC had a concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yes, it is a dilemma. CNN is always 100% correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 10:22 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. This journalist interviewed WTC master Leslie Robertson himself..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. A few comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 11:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I could apply that theory to those who believe in a "steel core". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. You might have a point except |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. New WTC7 has a concrete core but you would not know it from the outside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. WTC 7 has a concrete core? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 01:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. The new WTC7 has a re-inforced concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. You mean this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Silverstein :" the building will have a concrete core rather than a ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 02:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Yes, it does appear that the new WTC 7 has a concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. And that "Source" was written after 9/11! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Excellent Point: Post 9-11 Structural Statement Must Qualify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 03:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
50. There Is That Ugly Selectivity Again - Demo Only Pic's That Show Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-07-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
65. WONDER? Denial Continues after L. Robertson "a reinforced concrete core" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 05:11 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. RE: Leslie Robertson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 02:26 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Robertson Talks About The Interior Box Columns 30 Years After |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. He said nothing about your "interior box columns". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Interior Box Columns Ring Core Area. ASSOC. W/Service core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. If an error in evaluation has be made, I believe it has been made by you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 02:25 AM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Robertson Identifies The Concrete Core Here. You've Seen This Before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 02:58 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. My objection to your interpretation of that article is still the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Context Of Article: Concrete Core INFO Came From Leslie Robertson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 03:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Your argument is based on adherence to journalistic ethics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 04:58 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. At Least My Argument Has A Basis With Evidence Corroborating It. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 03:57 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. You are correct when you say that Robertson used the word "of". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #82 |
86. How Can Columns Inside The Core Be Linked To Outside Walls? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 05:14 AM Response to Reply #86 |
91. The Outrigger Space Frame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 06:56 PM Response to Reply #91 |
100. Hat Truss Could Have Existed, But Does Not Prove Steel Core Columns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 10:50 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. I was simply answering your question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Trust Statements Early Over Late In The Deception Parade- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 08:12 AM Response to Reply #102 |
104. He sold out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Paid Off With Award. No Mention Of Core, Critical Structural Element |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 12:26 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. You may chose to believe that, but it is hardly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 02:06 AM Response to Reply #107 |
114. You Must Not Be Looking-Early Statements Okay, Late No, Not W/Robertson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 06:34 PM Response to Reply #102 |
110. How about some sources from the '60's and '70's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Old CONST. Photos Can Be Used To Make A Fake Look More Real, Not Related |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #113 |
118. I don't recall even posting photos in my last reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 03:38 PM Response to Reply #118 |
120. Picture Did Not Show Steel Core Columns. We Cannot Confirm Text As Early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 07:28 AM Response to Reply #120 |
127. Confirming Information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #127 |
131. "viscoelastic dampers" Perhaps Not In Use In The Late 1970's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #131 |
136. Did you mean the late 1960's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #136 |
138. Viscoelastics Probably Not In Towers. Oxford Dictionary Sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #138 |
149. Unidentified Flying Sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #149 |
161. Since Dumbing Down, Respect For Common Knowledge Getting Scarce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #161 |
169. What the hell are you even talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 09:32 PM Response to Reply #100 |
111. ah once again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 11:38 AM Response to Reply #111 |
117. No Need For DOC. Demo Photos Have Proof, Learn To Use AVAIL. Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:20 AM Response to Reply #117 |
151. no photos during construction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #151 |
155. So Wrong! There Were Photos But The Core Was Inside Of The Steel Framework |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #155 |
156. thats what you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 12:56 AM Response to Reply #111 |
134. Repetitive Errors: I Post Proof Of The Concrete Core, Corroborated Dynamic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #111 |
139. WONDER, WONDER How Sabbat Can Pretend He Seeks Truth-EVID. & Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #139 |
154. again with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
49. Selective Acceptance Of Evidence-Trust Construction Photos, Not Demo Pic's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 03:45 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. The irony of you asking if I know what selectivity means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 11:39 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Why, You Never Produce Real Evidence For Me To Select From. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:23 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Again with the free fall nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. The Major Event Becomes "Nonsense"-Your Images Have No Corroboration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 11:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
121. OK then, how 'bout FOX News? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:23 AM Response to Reply #121 |
152. concrete in WTC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:15 PM Response to Reply #121 |
158. Umm...kinda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 09:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Looks like those guys in Oxford saw the same 1990 video! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jose Diablo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. ERRORS: Many Images Exist. Many Know Of Concrete Core-You Confusor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Your words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Feign Confusion Intentionally, Maybe Reader Will Be Confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Deleted message |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Try Using Evidence And Logic Instead Of Deceptive Manipulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Many Images Exist??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:48 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Here Are 2 More-But You Don't Use Information, So You Won't See The Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. So you have no images showing a concrete core? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Like I Said. You Do Not Use Information That Helps Explain Free Fall-Photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 07:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Stop trying to blame me for your inability to provide an image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 11:51 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Here Is An Image That Can Only Be A Concrete Core-Oh, You Don't Use Eviden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 05:52 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Good Lord, it's a simple request. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. You Prove You Will Not Use Evidence By Not Accepting Good Evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 10:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. That does not qualify as evidence for a concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 11:35 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. It Is The Core, And You Haven't Explained Why The Core Columns R Not Seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-07-06 10:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
66. Clearly You Pretend To Be Interested In The Truth - Images Corroborated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
67. EUREKA! The Most Convoluted Distortion Intended To Confuse. Check It Out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 10:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
83. You've tried, others have tried and I've tried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 07:27 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. Proper Investigation Requires Structural Knowledge-Meaning You Sabotage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 02:54 PM Response to Reply #83 |
99. Leslie Robertson thinks bombs in the WTC is a "crazy thought!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. Christophera can you answer this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 09:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. This carpenter who worked in the WTC believed it had a concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 10:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. So what's the point? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Why is it that before and on 9/11 many believed WTC had concrete cores |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Can't you concrete core people answer a question with a declaration??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. You already know the fuckin' answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 09:34 AM Response to Reply #30 |
56. The official story is bull because ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. There is more chance of there being a concrete core than Pakistan...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:50 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Now I know you are either ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. I am on your side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Unreasonable Denial Frustrating, Cussing Normal, Concrete Core Existed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 05:55 AM Response to Reply #30 |
77. official story has it the towers had 110 floors - therefore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #77 |
88. ...the towers had 110 floors! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 05:43 AM Response to Reply #88 |
93. every pre 9-11 source i've seen says steel core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 08:11 AM Response to Reply #93 |
98. Do they explicitly say a steel "only " core....or do they just imply it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 06:01 AM Response to Reply #98 |
103. drywall etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Carpenter who installed drywall in WTC says WTC had concrete core! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 01:08 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Your source is a post on a forum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-12-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. His name is :Gregory A. Butler.........a local 608 carpenter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 04:13 AM Response to Reply #109 |
115. Every media report on the towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #115 |
119. The only cover up is post - 9/11. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 05:28 AM Response to Reply #119 |
124. nor does it prove it had a concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #124 |
129. Sure......but something in that building had to support the dead load..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. that's post 9-11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 06:29 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. Except that Architectural Record's description of the shape of the core: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 03:36 AM Response to Reply #133 |
135. does the 1976 movie prove there's a concrete core? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:12 AM Response to Reply #135 |
143. This Image Proves There Was A Concrete Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 06:50 AM Response to Reply #135 |
144. No the movie does not.......but this 1977 book effectively does! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gbwarming (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 09:37 AM Response to Reply #144 |
145. One New York Plaza has a concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #145 |
146. O' Hagan refers to both the WTC and 1 New York Plaza. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gbwarming (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #146 |
147. "a hypothetical model that portrays their general characteristics" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:06 AM Response to Reply #147 |
150. WTC and 1 New York Plaza conformed to that "hypothetical" model! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 04:24 PM Response to Reply #146 |
168. O'Hagen Defined A General Structural Configuration W/Concrete Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #115 |
122. We Need To See Some Evidence-Talk Of Talk Might Have No Substance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 05:30 AM Response to Reply #122 |
125. how about you show some pre 9-11 evidence proving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #125 |
128. searnineb Came Up With Best. Extra EVI., Photos Show Concrete Conclusively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #103 |
112. 1/2 True (+-).Perimeter Steel Took 50%. Interior Box COL's 30%, CONC. Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #98 |
153. the special on A&E |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #153 |
170. How About At Least A Description Of What They Showed-I Show Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 05:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
76. 1st time i ever heard of concrete core was from Christophera |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Description Of Concrete Core By P.E. Structrual ENG. In 12 States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 03:44 PM Response to Reply #76 |
87. Sure.....this MIT proffessor believed there was a concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 05:41 AM Response to Reply #87 |
92. "fireproofed in concrete" does not make for a concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 06:51 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. What you say is true....but you applying it in the wrong context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 07:47 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. "the 24m ´ 42m interior core consisted of 48 steel columns fireproofed in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 08:02 AM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Ghoniem: "steel columns that constituted the core" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 08:02 AM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Gee.....were all 48 columns on or around the perimeter of the core? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Deleted message |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. You Have No Evidence-Here I Answer The Way You Want. Read Original Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Free fall was possible ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Deleted message |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 05:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
70. Planes Cannot Bring Towers Down - Collapse Cannot Make Sand And Gravel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
46. "Have you ever seen a few argue so hard" - Yes, you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Against Concrete, No. I Argue For It When Evidence Says It Was Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #47 |
59. where did you get that sketch from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. I Created The Sketch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #64 |
84. That is a completely and utterly ridiculous theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 12:17 AM Response to Reply #84 |
90. I Notice You Have No Alternative EXPL. For Free Fall & No Other Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-13-06 04:17 AM Response to Reply #90 |
116. thermite cut up the steel beams, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 02:28 AM Response to Reply #116 |
123. Absolutely, But NOT Above The First Floor-No Molten Steel Found In streets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 05:34 AM Response to Reply #123 |
126. The top section disintegrated as it fell straight down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-14-06 03:44 PM Response to Reply #126 |
132. Intact Top Of WTC 2 Onto #3. Molten Steel Would Throw By Other EXPL. Video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:39 PM Response to Reply #123 |
157. I did see molten metal dripping from above the crash floors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-10-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #59 |
85. Good question, now you know why we question and want to see the video. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Show_Me _The_Truth (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #85 |
137. Wouldn't someone (more than 1) have talked by now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-15-06 10:37 PM Response to Reply #137 |
140. Off Topic-The Concrete Core Is Not A Theory-No Steel Core Columns Seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 12:12 AM Response to Reply #140 |
141. Christophera, on Frontline or Nova (I know-grain of salt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 12:54 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. Stairwells Had Drywall Separating From Elevator Shaft On At Least One SIde |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Show_Me _The_Truth (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 10:29 AM Response to Reply #140 |
148. Allot of Heresay and Supposition There |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 03:54 PM Response to Reply #148 |
159. Only One Large Error There. I Only Need Raw Evidence For Source. ?? Proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Show_Me _The_Truth (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. I don't need to show proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 09:32 PM Response to Reply #160 |
162. You Are The Master Of Tricky Pictures, I Simply Reason W/Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jschurchin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 09:42 PM Response to Reply #162 |
163. Hello, sorry to intrude..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 10:22 PM Response to Reply #163 |
164. Volumes Are Good Proof. Floors Were ONLY Official Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jschurchin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:05 PM Response to Reply #164 |
165. Yes they are....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 02:41 PM Response to Reply #165 |
166. The Basement Was Larger Than Tower Footprints-More Damage Below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 03:11 PM Response to Reply #85 |
167. You Answer Your Question To Me And Ignore My Answer, ---- Whoa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC