Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXCESSIVE BLINKING: a sign of non-comprehension or lying.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:26 PM
Original message
EXCESSIVE BLINKING: a sign of non-comprehension or lying.
That's my understanding of the body language implications of someone
blinking like Bush did tonight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just realized in this case it's both. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nervous about what is beyond those camera lenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or drugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. his contacts were dry
(drug addicts know all the best excuses)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. How dare they not believe my LIES!!!! ANGERY BUSH, FEARFUL BUSH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. You hit the nail on the head...
His entire body language screamed "how can you believe what this guy is saying? I'm the pRetzeldent!!! you hafta believe me!!!"...

This was the perfect forum to expose Lt AWOL's bullying mannerism's.

Senator Kerry performed BRILLIANTLY....Very, VERY Presidential...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. This brings up an interesting question.
Why don't we have each candidate hooked up to a polygraph in these debates?

I mean it. What exactly is the argument against something like that?

And what candidate in their right mind is going to come out and say no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The argument against it, of course, is...
It's an unconstitutionaly invasion of privacy. Oh wait, the constitution doesn't apply any more.

Then the argument against it is that it would tend to demean the office of the presidency. Oh wait, that doesn't apply any more either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm not sure how ensuring that a candidate for the highest
office in the world is telling the truth is unconstitutional.

Their privacy rights are superceded by the rights of everyone else to be sure that the person that they are handing a MASSIVE amount of power to won't abuse it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. How about a drug test?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. no polygraphs!
They measure your stress over an answer, not your truthfullness.

I've been in a group of 7 people taking a polygraph, 4 flunked the first time through, and passed on a retake on a different day. I had to restart mine, because at first the blood pressure cuff was too tight, and instead of thinking "Yes" or "no" as I said it, I was thinking "omg, my arm is turning blue, I just know it, it's getting numb, what if it falls off?"

I couldn't get past the first few control questions without a false deceptive reading ...

1. What's 2+2?
Me: 4. (Chart looks good.)

2. Are you sure?
Me: (silently) in my math system, it's 4, but what about other math systems? This is really a matter of how I perceive reality, who am I to say it can only be 4?
(outloud) Yes. (chart shows I'm being deceptive.)

They just aren't accurate. The real value of them comes as much from the skill of the interviewer in getting confessions out of you as you take it, which wouldn't happen here. Plus they are more for yes/no answers, not lengthy statements.

Lie detector tests are just evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Plus they are more for yes/no answers, not lengthy statements.
This is a good point that I hadn't considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's way over his head and it shows. His answers are pointless.
He doesn't address Kerry. He just spouts his own crap. Same shit different day--only less blinking and improved facial expressions. Big deal. He still circumvents arguments and sounds like a moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. The "lie" was acting like he was listening respectfully to Kerry
He was blinking up a storm while making sure he didn't make faces. He was pouring his whole body into not making faces. How can he fight a war on terror when the poor man is forced by the liberal press to concentrate ENTIRELY on not making faces? He's only human!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. It's hard work trying to concentrate! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. That was morse code
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 11:47 PM by BrotherBuzz
he was asking pleading for more help from the boys backstage. ;)

.... . .-.. .--. -- .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SudieJD Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Blinked 20 Times In One Minute!
I just re-watched the debate on C-Span. I counted 20X in one minute of blinking by Dubba.

Lier!

Sudie in MN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't know if it's been proven but I worked with a guy who blinked..
very rapidly when he lied or was making up an answer to a question that he didn't know the answer to, which he did from time to time. He did not do it when he was being truthful.

One day I finally said to him that I knew he had just lied to me abt something and mentioned the blinking. He had no idea that he was doing it (and did admit that he had just lied to me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sounds like what the Freepers said about Edwards
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 12:06 AM by Nederland
Why is it that people around here only believe what supports their biases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC