Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Dean??? One Reason...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:50 PM
Original message
Why Dean??? One Reason...
Because he is the only one speaking up against the war..And that settles my vote right then and there..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. except for all...
the others that are speaking up against the war. Like Kucinich, Clark, Moseley-Braun, Sharpton, and yes, even Kerry and Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kucinich was the only Congressmen to stand his anti-war ground
(Kucinich the Congressional candidate) The others were chickenshit Bush enablers. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Believe what you want...
but you'll have to prove to me that Moseley-Braun, Sharpton and Clark were "chickenshit Bush enablers".

No need to be sorry, either. You're free to believe whatever outlandish stuff you want. But if you spout it here, you'd best have something to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Hello...sharpton, mosley braun, and clark AREN"T
"Congressmen".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. the original assertion
is that Dean was the only candidate to oppose the war. That's demonstrably false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. but they werent chickenshit bush enablers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. He didn't say they were if you read
it Closely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Some have funny ways of speaking, though
For example Kerry - out of both sides of his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ain't that a hoot Dean also!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Clark was for the war... and said he'd vote for the IWR


and Sharpton and CMB were not even really getting any attention back when the war vote was happening.

Kucinich is the only one on your list who really deserves the same credit as Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is It Time to Believe?
Bill Clinton rebuilt the Democratic Party in crucial ways. But Howard Dean is rebuilding it in a way Clinton missed.
Party insiders would do well to make their peace with it.

by Michael Tomasky

http://www.prospect.org/print-friendly/print/V15/1/tomasky-m.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I absolutely love Michael Tomasky!
He was a writer for New York Magazine and now an executive editor at "The American Prospect" TAP and he's the best!
Thanks, duder!
<snip>
"Insiders need to start thinking about making their peace with Deanism. The party—the (still) post-1988 party—needs a rebuilt base, and Dean is doing that in a way that has no precedent. And instead of fretting about all the ways Dean could lose, the insiders might do better to spend some time thinking about how he might win.

Because he might. It was interesting that, in the wake of Gore's endorsement of Dean, it was conservative commentator William Kristol who wrote the column that most emphatically enumerated Bush's vulnerabilities. Sure, Kristol may have had his own reasons for arguing that Dean is competitive, but the facts of Bush's weak points are real. He has the powers of incumbency, money and a feared (actually, overly feared) political operation. But his numbers are soft. Gore's 2000 states plus Ohio or Arizona is a long, long way from being an impossible task—for Dean or for any of the aforementioned.

So let the race begin. And expect the impossible. It happens often.<snip>

Michael Tomasky

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do you watch anyone other than Dean?
Your statement is easily proven incorrect. I don't want to waste my time to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Kucinich vote was heroic, Dean was just an opportunist
Kucinich had to actually vote and has to face the voters again. Dean was just another out of work politician when he came out of left field against this war. Dean was just looking for an opportunity to differentiate himself from the other Dems. Compare that with Kucinich's lifelong campaign for peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. exactly (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Mega Dittos ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dean is for the bloated pentagon budget
also hes says he is for the contnued occupation of a war he thinks is wrong
and Kucinich has been against the war before he ran for pres wants to stop the occupation of iraq to avoid more deaths wants to cut the pentagon budget and wants to establish a cabnit level department of peace
So much for the anti war cannidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Dean is for getting out of Iraq but
not dropping it like a Hot Potato. bushco made a big mess there and we have to clean up his waste and do it ethically.

Dean is not anti-war. Dean is anti-this bogus invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. kucinich is for
withdrawel from iraq and getting sthe un in (a much more legit org than the us military)he is also for giving reperations for iraq Support the Troops Bring 'em Home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. DK spoke up first, and voted against it in Congress
Dean himself gave DK credit a few debates ago for his consistent anti-war stance, right there on stage.

Please consider that fact before posting a one sentence thread with such an egregious error. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well be fair to Kucinich... he was speakign out too


He deserves as much credit as Dean on that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, Kucinich does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dennis was speaking against the war before, during and now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. welcome to the Dean campaign!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC