Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How influencial is The Washington Post accross the country?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BUSHOUT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:11 AM
Original message
How influencial is The Washington Post accross the country?
And I can't remember if this is a left or right leaning paper....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FuzzyHamster Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. anything outside of Fox, etc
will be considered "liberal media" by the conservatives. Otherwise, I don't see it as being particularly influencial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. WaPo is one of the 2 biggies.
NYT and WaPo, quite influential.

WaPo is center with tendancy to lean slightly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. slightly right?
Goodnes me, the whole paper has been blowing Bush and the GOP for years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. with the beltway people, very; with general population not so
maybe in Virginia and Maryland. I think a persons local paper endorsement would have more weight with people than the Washington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. It carried alot of weight after Watergate,
but in the last few years, not very.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. doesn't affect voters in large numbers, but It Matters in a serious way

But the significance is fairly large. The WP is one of the Big Three papers that represent the voice of the Establishment to foreign governments and the people who run things in this country.

The WP the mirror of opinion in Alexandria/Georgetown and other DCburbia where all the people who really run the federal government and steer it in certain directions live- think tank people, Party operatives, federal agency mid-level management, the consultants and analysts and federal prosecutors and such who form the majority of the numbers to the 'ruling class' of the federal government apparatus. It's the people who adapt and conform the federal government's workings to the society it governs.

This endorsement of Kerry is an admission that they guessed badly and wrong four years ago by embracing the 'conservative', that the country can't be run for and by outdated colonial and theological and social dogmas anymore. They don't like and don't quite understand what the alternative is, but they feel they have no real choice but to abandon the sinking ship of Bush/Cheney and all that entails. It's all an admission that B/C are out of step with the country and the Beltway crowd has been too, which dates back to 1998 at least.

The WSJ is the party organ of the corporate wealth/power gamesfolk, aka Business Establishment. The NYT is the voice of the non-federal and non-corporate Establishments in the country: state government, the real professions, the industries (e.g. healthcare, 'defense', education) that are diffuse. The WSJ gives the Republican Party a kind of national bullhorn by which to bring their own into line, the NYT serves as something of the kind for Democrats.

Basically, foreign governments and powerful people in the U.S. look at the endorsements- WSJ to Bush reluctantly, NYT to Kerry by choice, and WaPo to Kerry reluctantly- and they see that the American establishments are pretty close to consensus around knocking the Bush/Cheney set out of power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for the list - e-mails will go out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Washington Post has endorsed Kerry - heard on C-SPAN
Edited on Sun Oct-24-04 07:47 AM by npincus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Read by many Northern Virginians
whether they be left or right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC