Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey, give me the "Kerry Just Won Ohio" Bullshit on Nov 3rd.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:51 PM
Original message
Hey, give me the "Kerry Just Won Ohio" Bullshit on Nov 3rd.
Edited on Sun Oct-24-04 07:00 PM by Cyrano
Stop the polling and early voting crap.

And stop getting everyone worked up over Ohio.

If the election were held today and all the votes were counted, Kerry would win big.

But the fact is that every prick Republican lawyer is out there working on negating any vote cast for Kerry.

Let's talk about who "won Ohio" after we win Ohio. In the meantime, cut the rhetoric and keep getting people out to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. We are working on it in NE Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We are working on it in SW Ohio - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. How are you dealing with the Republican "challengers?"
Can you get an injunction to stop them from holding up the line?

They should be pulled aside when they challenge someone, so the line keeps moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not an expert BUT
according to the information I've read (here and in news reports) if a person is challenged he is taken away from the polling station and out of earshot of the challenger. He is then asked several questions by the presiding elections officer. If he satisfies the officer that he is eligible he is allowed to vote. I am unclear if the voter must sign an affidavit in all challenge situations or if all challenged voters ballots must be ruled as provisional or if only those successfully challenged but still insistent on voting must be provisional.

As for the challenger causing disruptions and delays, the persiding officer has it in his or her power to kick the challenger out if deemed disruptive of the orderly voting process.

Dems will have challengers and watchers to help ensure that this process does not unduly impede the voting and that all eligible voters get to vote. A phone bank of lawyers will also be available for consultation and rapid responce to "hot spots".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. OK, I hope you're able to stop them from slowing the line, and
if a Republican challenger is particularly obnoxious, put his or her photo on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eriffle Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Agreed
With early voting now happening in a bunch of states people who half listen or who are too busy to immerse themselves into the ins and outs of a political season believe that the polls are actually early voting results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. I should have replied to that other thread immediately
I clicked on the "We just won Ohio" thread when it was brand new, and saw Bush's name at the bottom of the supposed ballot. That was obviously against state law and tradition, so I rejected the ballot as phony and the thread as irrelevant. Then I come back and there were 90+ replies.

Someone finally mentioned the order of the candidate names at very bottom before the thread was locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC