Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 on *'s Watch: will JK say this ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:11 AM
Original message
9/11 on *'s Watch: will JK say this ?
or is this too politically incorrect, according to the media ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too scared
to do that. They should at least say. "Its a suprise that the president wants to bring up one of his biggest failures"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. And what will happen if God Forbid an attack occured on Kerry's...
watch? Those words would come back to haunt him. Kerry is wise not to say it. His surrogate should, but he should not do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. excellent point, eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. it's more the media that's the problem
rather than just report that it was Kerry's response to Bush people saying how there will be a terrorist attack if Kerry was in office. they would try to claim that Kerry said Bush caused the attacks and then it will be all about how Kerry said something so horrible and outrageous and that Kerry doesn't blame Bin Laden but blames Bush and other crap.

just look at how they reacted with the mary cheney and Teresa thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Good point - this is why his surrogates are saying it

Wes Clark was very pointed in his remarks re: 9/11 when I saw him last week in VA.

Clarks words: "9/11 could have been prevented, and with the right administration in place it would have been."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Surrogates are already saying it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kind of wish they would, but Bush and his administration
never, ever, EVER are accountable for anything. They never take responsibility for things that have happened during his tenure.

Didn't you get the memo that 9/11 is Clinton's fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. yeah, i think Hannity gave it to us , [vomit] eom
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 09:18 AM by steve2470
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secular_warrior Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. too late - too dangerous
Should've done it much earlier and built the case, but didn't thanks to the wimpy technocrats running the campaign. Now it's too late and could backfire as sounding like an unfair "conspiracy theory" attack against "our president".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's the inconsistency
If no attacks in three years mean Bush is protecting, then it follows that the attack on 9/11 meant he wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. but but but
georgie is the special olympics preznit, how could we blame a retard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC