joanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 03:59 PM
Original message |
So why did Kerry cave in so soon? |
|
I still havent recovered from the speedy concession.
There is more and more evidence of massive fraud.
So what gives?
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message |
1. My guess is that, unlike last time, the fraud was so egregious |
|
that it was decided that ANY public or legal examination of the election was too risky. I mean, they did have to use the USSC last time to fix it, and a second time there would be worse than this attempted stonewall.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-08-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Because the machines gave * a 3.5 mill vote cushion. And Kerry.. |
|
would have seemed very foolish and out of touch by contesting the results.
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-08-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. 110K "vapor votes" in 31 red states = 3,41 million |
|
of course some of the smaller states would have to be "adjusted", but in bigger states LIKE FLORIDA, the extra could easily be camouflaged.
The mandate is a phony number that had to be there to disguise the fraud, and dissuade an uproar..
|
Atlant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-08-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
3. He's a political coward. |
|
It's why the Republican media wanted him nominated.
Atlant
|
htuttle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-08-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I've come to the conclusion that he bailed to save his political career |
|
I've also come to the conclusion that his motivations for voting for the IWR were exactly the same.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-08-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
5. the swift boat vets and the flip-flop wavers wer right I guess |
|
either that or the entire thing was a sham.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |