Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does a big turnout at the polls now favor Republicans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 05:57 PM
Original message
Does a big turnout at the polls now favor Republicans?
I'm not saying it does or doesn't because I don't know. I'd like to hear your opinion. For years the belief was that if voters turnout it favors the Democrats. Well, even with the usual GOP tricks to steal the election it does appear that this election saw the biggest turnout since 1968. But Bush still "won" by 3.5 million in the popular vote. Kerry got some five million plus more votes than Gore, but Bush got about 9 million more votes than he did in 2000.

Does a smaller turnout now favor Dems who can deliver their targeted voters more than a big turnout in this day and age when party affiliation is no longer in vogue? For instance, in '68 and '60 when over 60% of Registered voters did turnout the Democrats had a clear edge in registration. Now the two parties are near parity in overall registration and truth be told the Reps may actually have the edge when you consider that in the south there are more registered Dems than Republicans but many of them vote Republican in presidential elections (and beginning to vote Republican in other elections too) and are just too lazy to change their party ID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. as long as there is electronic voting
all possible forms of turnout favor repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. BINGO
I don't believe for a second that so many stupid people could think Bush is doing such a great job it brought them to the voting booth this time but not last time. BULLSHIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yup! High turnout, low turnout, it's all good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not necessarily
We had a big turnout in Austin and WE KICKED THEOR ASSES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Travis Co. went blue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You bet!
Kerry---56%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where I live
used to be a "swing" area, went for Clinton both times. But, in 2002 and 2004, there was a big increase in repig voters (punch cards until next election). There's a church on every corner, almost, so they're doing something in those churches to get out people who didn't vote before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Republicans could get a 2% turnout and still win
As long as Diebold is still being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. The problems are party identification and loyalty
The percentage of turnout really doesn't matter if both sides have equal representation -- it was 37 -37 in party ID this year -- yet GOP voters crossover to our candidate 3-5% less than our voters vote for the Republican.

As 9/11 gets further away and the GOP overreaches and errs, we have a chance to re-establish a party ID lead. Obviously we need to make inroads in rural areas. That should be a strategic focus immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC