Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Candidates shouldn't "endorse" the primary winner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 03:49 PM
Original message
Candidates shouldn't "endorse" the primary winner
they should actively campaign FOR the primary winner throughout the general election.

If candidate x doesn't win the nomination I think it is very likely that a number of that candidate's supporters will simply not vote.
Especially after all the party division we have seen so far.
A simple endorsement isn't going to change this much.... if they actually campaign for the nominee it probably will.

If the candidates actually care about the country as much as they say, they will work with the primary winner, WHOEVER IT IS, to defeat shrub.

I am sending a letter to the candidate I support asking that if they don't win the primary, they offer to campaign for whoever does.

Please send a similar letter to your candidate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I think there's a real danger of Dean, DK, and Clark
supporters not supporting a different nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. There is a very slim possibility that a miniscule number of Clark
supporters might not rally to the banner of whoever.

That tiny number would vary. Maybe more if Joe2004 got the nod. Dean might not insprire either.

However, since the vast majority of Wes's supporters, and the rationale for the Draft Clark movement in the first place was to beat the incumbent in November, it is obvious Clark supporters will be right up front when it comes to working the campaign.

This is not an academic debate to most of us, you know. We haven't been following a politician for years, or for some, for decades. We greatly fear that democracy itself is at risk if the pResident gets a second term, so we will back whoever manages to get the nod.

So, if you really think Clark supporters would turn away from this campaign, I think you really have to ask yourself what we do. If we don't beat this guy, this time, where on Earth will we be able to go that will not suffer as a result of his policies.

This election really is for all the marbles. That's why we get so worked up about it.

A ham sandwich--and honest to God ham sandwich--would get my vote before the Invisible Airman. And if I'm that serious about what's at stake here, why would I balk at supporting another candidate?

ABB Rules, dude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. isn't it up to the candidate to win those votes?
As a Dean supporter, I don't expect folks who support Kucinich or any other candidate to automatically raise the Dean flag should he win the nomination.

ABB isn't the best campaign idea we have going forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Honestly, Sir
It is for those who oppose the most reactionary elements of our polity to turn out and vote them out of the office they recently usurped. There is no other matter so pressing; there is nothing that can be accomplished to the good until this is done.

There is no issue whatever on the table but the defeat of the criminals of the '00 Coup; all "issues" are mere segments of this great concern.

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am sure they will take your letter under advisement n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm hoping they will
if enough people send similar letters.

Given the magnitude of the next election and the nastiness of the campaign I'm surprised the DNC hasn't suggested such a thing to the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I trust my candidate will make the right decision at the right time
Why on earth would I or anyone else want to be pressuring my candidate to make some silly pledge? I should hope he has more important things to think about right now.


Sounds like a heavy-handed DLC tactic. Stinks...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. silly pledge?
I did not suggest any 'pledge', nor do I consider it 'silly' to expect this of all of the candidates.

I do consider it very short sighted not to see the value of the candidates agreeing to campaign for the nominee, especially with all of the vitriol that has been circulating.

I want to see shrub defeated.
I think that is FAR MORE important than the victory of any particular candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well Said, Mr. Sangrail
The only real issue at stake in the Party primary is which candidate stands the best chance of defeating the current administration. That is the important question, to which all else ought to be subordinated, and in the general election, all who claim to oppose reactionary power must turn out against the criminals of the '00 Coup.

"Now, my mother never bothered about bringing me up. She just saw to it that I got whacked at decent intervals and was taught the difference between right and wrong; there is some difference, you know, but I've forgotten what it is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC