Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Expert: Bush re-election will lead to Al Qaeda Nuke attack in US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Her Blondness Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 07:50 AM
Original message
Expert: Bush re-election will lead to Al Qaeda Nuke attack in US
http://salon.com/opinion/right_hook/2004/12/01/terror_cia/print.html

From today's Salon - "Right Hook" --

Terrorism expert says Bush's reelection gave bin Laden a "kosher stamp from the Islamic world" to use nukes on U.S. -- and a major attack is "inevitable."

One well-known conservative thinks that President Bush's reelection will lead to a horrific al-Qaida attack. According to the Jerusalem Post, Yossef Bodansky, the Israeli-born former director of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare and author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America," says that an al-Qaida attack on the U.S. with nonconventional weapons is virtually "inevitable," and that the organization is likely "tying up the knots" for such an attack. "All of the warnings we have today indicate that a major strike -- something more horrible than anything we've seen before -- is all but inevitable," he told the Post on Sunday.

After 9/11 and the launch of the U.S. global war on terrorism, a theological debate began within the operational arm of al-Qaida, Bodansky says, over whether the mass killing of innocents using weapons of mass destruction was permissible. Former CIA analyst and bin Laden expert Michael Scheuer asserted in his book "Imperial Hubris" that bin Laden has had the Islamic world's approval to use nuclear weapons against U.S. civilians since May 2003, when a Saudi cleric condoned it in a "lucidly written" treatise citing Islamic law and rebuking U.S. transgressions against Muslims.

Bodansky argues that Bush's reelection has poured fuel on that fire.
"While bin Laden and his associates argued that by virtue of their participation in US democracy, US citizens were enabling their rulers to fight, other Islamic luminaries contended that this does not permit such massive attacks, Bodansky said. The reelection of Bush in November, he said, was viewed by bin Laden and his cohorts as a decisive answer to this deliberation, with Americans now 'choosing' to be the enemies of Islam. In bin Laden's mind-set, he said, the stage was set for a non-conventional attack. While there may still be some vestiges of debate and doubt within Islamic circles, he believes that planning for such an attack is finished. 'They got the kosher stamp from the Islamic world to use nuclear weapons,' he said."

Curiously, this analysis did not get any play in the media before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now that the election is over it's time to put the fear of God ..
back into America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. LIHOP or MIHOP, they "need" another attack

we still have some freedoms...

LAX would be the most likely, followed closely by San Fran
(if you are going to nuke the US - or allow it to be nuked - why
not the state most hated by the Freepers? God shall smite the
sodomites! heavy sarcasm here, btw)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Exactly. And I don't think Bush's employees are going to wait until Sept.
this time.

There is much work for their Bushevik Masters (or perhaps it's just loosely affiliated pals who's interests are the same for different reasons) still yet to do and little time.

I agree, but I didn't need an "expert" to tell me, and neither did you I see.

Of course it's coming, like not follows day as the Invasion of France followed the Invasion of Poland following the Sitzkrieg.

You know, the Sitzkrieg like Imperial Amerika is currently in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Plays right into the Neocon plans
Such an attack would be the carte blanche excuse for worldwide military action while basically cancelling the constitution and imposing rule by fiat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. we have never been in more danger than right now
we will get hit again. the unjustified occupation of iraq sealed the deal on it. the only question is where and when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. and, for obvious reasons,
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 08:26 AM by Paradise
it could very well take place in a "red state/s" this time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Her Blondness Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. But the election really isn't over until the electoral college
Here's my plan: If this bit of news gets into the mainstream and gets a lot of play, maybe some bush electors will get spooked into "turning" and voting for Kerry when the electoral college votes. If we're going to get nuked because bush was elected, maybe fear would work in Kerry's favor! It would be so ironic.

That's the best I can do at this point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC