Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help. I want simplified graph or outline, of Vote Irregularities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WebeBlue Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 06:40 PM
Original message
Help. I want simplified graph or outline, of Vote Irregularities
I have been following as many of the Vote irregularities postings here and at DU, and Daily Kos. They are dense, weighty, and I'm looking for or wondering if there is a simplified way to present the material. I'd like to post to some of my blogs, and want to target audiences that don't have enough interest to read through involved and weighty articles....(you know, the IQ factor, and KISS principle).


I'm sure some clever souls here have encapsulated the vast information into a simple, quickly visible graph or chart or talking point or outline. Can then attempt to work on raising the doubt level of the non-believers.

Anyone know of something that can be readily pointed out for me...urls, etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwmealy Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're in luck.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 03:15 AM by jwmealy
Here's my preliminary analysis:
www.selftest.net/redshift.htm

Look at the graphic at the bottom of the page that says, "Start Here".

Further analysis led to this prediction:

For every state in which the disrepancy between last-thing Nov. 2 consortium exit polls and tabulated results for red shift or negative blue shift is greater than the margin of error, the following equation will be true:

Red Shift + Final Spread + 1 > Greatest Recorded Red Shift for the 51 States.

This prediction proved true in all 18 cases.

Hold on to this information. TruthIsAll or other statisticians will confirm its significance, if I don't. In a word, this is proof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC