Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House staffer "dumbfounded" by privacy uproar (tax return provision)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:30 AM
Original message
House staffer "dumbfounded" by privacy uproar (tax return provision)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6641918/

A mid-level House aide said yesterday that he was the one who, during last month's drafting of a huge spending bill, added a provision that could give staffers on the House and Senate appropriations committees broad access to Americans' tax returns.

Richard E. Efford, a 19-year veteran of the House Appropriations Committee, said he did not inform any elected official before inserting the provision and advised his immediate boss, Rep. Ernest J. Istook Jr. (R-Okla.), only after it was too late to make changes. He said other House and Senate appropriations staffers in both parties were aware of the provision, however, and believed it gave them needed authority to enter facilities of the Internal Revenue Service to inspect how taxpayer funds were being used.

"I would guess we all thought it was a housekeeping thing that would help our bosses but did not need to be elevated up to them," said Efford, a mild-mannered man who described himself as "dumbfounded" by the uproar.

When the existence of the provision became known Nov. 20, just hours before Congress was to vote on the spending bill and adjourn, irate lawmakers in both parties denounced it as a sinister encroachment on Americans' privacy. Several suggested its presence in the spending bill may have had the approval of GOP leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. More 'pass the buck'
Has any republican in recent memory ever taken responsibility for his actions? Pass the buck down the line until someone accepts it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. NO, and our "representatives" are putting bills together with
absolutely NO knowledge of what their staffers do? Do we start voting for the administrative clerks now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. At a minimum they should fire that employee.
Republicans say that they'll run government the way they run business (into the ground). Thus, fire the incompetent son of a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Housekeeping?
What else have they done to make things tidy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Supposedly within the congress, GAO & others
there are investigative bodies for audits... After 19 years one would think that would be common knowledge for even the lowest plebe. It took him 19 years to get to that level of silly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. oh wasn't his three year old brother who slipped it in
i didn't just fall off a turnip truck ya know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsAnthropy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is terrifying that elected officials do not read what they vote on!
Perhaps Michael Moore should read it to them, like he did the Patriot Act. Who knows what else is hiding in those bills that we won't discover for years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just plain dumb, not dumbfounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. So the staffer wouldn't mean sending everyone all his returns
or posting them on the web
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC