Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could it be they brought Kerik onboard...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:30 PM
Original message
Could it be they brought Kerik onboard...
to use further down the road as a scape goat? As if they are thinking head when another attack occurs? This guy comes across as a train wreck waiting to happen. If an attack were to occur they could quickly get their message out that is was his incompetence that lead to it not shrubs policies or leadership. Just a thought.

I know some time ago I watched Kerik debate Wes Clark and I felt embarrassed for the guy. He was completely out of his league.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. They will continue to blame Clinton for the Terra attacks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sad but true...
I'd like to know when the Dems are going to walk upright and begin to start blaming Shrub for his disaster(s). The election wasn't enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I think most are getting hip to the Clinton scapegoating
They used it to the point of nausea and now it's coming back at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. he didn't go to college - how could he even try to debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. He couldn't lift Clark's lunchbox.
He's just an opportunistic asskisser who will say ANYTHING to run with the real sharks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. But...don't you feel safer ??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why isn't Kerik accountable for the disasters relating to the Iraqi police
Edited on Fri Dec-03-04 01:51 PM by henslee
force? -- like the massacre of the busload of new recruits -- like cops lining up outside for payday only to get suicide bombed -- which seems to have happened a few times. Just me or does something seem fundamentally flawed with the policies and procedures surounding the Iraqi police force? And if Kerik was in charge of setting up the force as MSM keeps touting -- then WTF didn't he stay and finish the job? IMO-- Kerik is virtually illiterate -- he dropped out of high school and sounds like it. He is in way over his head and gamed his way to his current stature on the currency of 9-11 flag waving. Watch him go down in flames.


ON EDIT -- SOMEONE ON MSNBC JUST MADE THE SAME POINT I DID ABOUT KERIK'S IRAQI POLICE SQUAD RESUME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. totally agree
funny how you only hear the talking heads speak about that in passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Actually, t'was a screenshot of a viewer email. Should have been clearer.
Edited on Fri Dec-03-04 01:53 PM by henslee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I didn't mean it like that
I used "you" generically like "you" as in we...if that makes any sense. Sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Meet your jailer
Da Enforcer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC