Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When we talk about "Bush", WHO are we really talking about?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:12 PM
Original message
When we talk about "Bush", WHO are we really talking about?
The way I see it, Bush isn't really the one who's charge; he's like Ronald Reagan, a figurehead and mouthpiece for a group behind him with its own agenda.

Whenever I read "Bush proposes a new measure...Bush calls for such-and-such...", I immediately consider it a more convenient and quicker way to say "Dick Cheney and Karl Rove have instructed President Bush to publicly announce a new measure that they want to have enacted..."

They just need Bush to talk in front of a camera and to sign documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney and Rove - definitely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree, however,
I think they are very good at making the boy king feel like he is an integral part of the decision making process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Energy conglomerate board room.
Kenny Boy was the chairman until he had a great fall.
Saudi financier.
Carlyle group multiple entities.

Cheney is the main the speaker.
Rove is the commissar Rasputin.
Poppy is the security chief.
Condi head cheerleader.

Babs is control for Junior. (shades of the Manchuria) life imitates art
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleiku52cab Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. The whole neocon gang
but I don't KKKKarl is an ideologue like the others - he just likes to be a king maker and play the political power game. This, in my opinion, makes him more evil than the true believers in the rest of the cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. neocons are the latest tool.
when the board decides the neocons are out the door. you can change politics like you change your clothes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. The problem is.......
we may never really know for sure.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. True, like the hair dye commercial.
Sadly, ** may not know who for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. cast a giant shadow government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. I just feel Bushie tried to "throw" the election
C'mon the BULGE was obvious. The never wavering on stupid decisions?

Wanted to go back to brush clearing. They wouldn't let him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. throwing the election
My God, if Bush couldn't throw the election after his terrible performances in the debates, I don't know what else he could have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't let him off the hook like that
I don't give a shit IF he is just the talking head (and he probably is). He's still the president and the buck is supposed to stop with him. He LOVES it when people blame someone else.

Personally I got enough blame to go around for ALL of them, but ultimately HE is the one most responsible. He and he alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vox_Reason Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Clearly he's due plenty of blame, but...
I think he's completely controlled by a bunch of other people who are scheming, evil machiavellians. Bush himself is essentially a moron; an empty suit; a mouthpiece; a marionette.

He (semi-literately) reads the speeches he's given; he signs the legislation he's told to sign; he supports the people he's told to support; he lets other people read his "news" to him; etc. His record speaks volumes. He's in completely over his head. If it weren't for his cabinet and handlers, who knows what may have happened by now?

The fact that Bush is so intellectually inferior to the likes of John Kerry makes this election even more difficult to swallow. Are there really enough idiots in this country who would rather have the obviously dumber guy in charge?

Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't disagree with a thing you said.
But he's still an adult, he's of at least enough IQ points to reasonably know what he's doing (as in not moderately retarded). So regardless of how he's being used (and I agree he is NOT the brains of the outfit), I still hold him responsible in addition to all the others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vox_Reason Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can't disagree, Bouncy Ball.
You're quite right.

Even though he's fully controlled by others who are smarter and who have more specific evil intentions, he's not SO moronic as to be completely irresponsible for what results from the executive orders and legislation he "legitimates".

Even if you're intellectually dull, you should be able to perceive and condemn obvious evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. The "power" leaders of the Republican party. Wolfie being the brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC