Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Denying gay couples equal benefits is UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:22 PM
Original message
Denying gay couples equal benefits is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Excerpted from the 14th ammendment...

"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Homosexuals are being denied their Privileges as citizens of the United States WITHOUT due process by law. I don't give a shit if states have passed laws or constitutional amendments to ban gay people from having equal benefits, those laws are UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

And in response to the typical freeper argument that they have the same rights as everybody else, to enter a homosexual union, that is like telling a wheelchair bound person that they have the same rights as everybody else, to walk up stairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. but since when did being wrong stand in the way of bigotry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wrong, right, it doesn't matter... it's STILL unconstitutional
That should be the end of discussion with these people. Granted, they support the Patriot Act, so, unconstitutional doesn't really mean much to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. it appears that the bible
horrifically interpreted by mad men is replacing our constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's their fear
Why do you think they want to amend the federal Constitution so badly? I've heard a bunch of legal scholars claim that the Supreme Court (assuming it doesn't get taken over by the wingnuts) will one day rule exactly ths way -- as it did in Loving v. Virginia (holding that bans on interracial marriage was unconstitutional). But like in Loving, they can't do it until the political climate allows it to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's true
but for some reason PERSONAL morality matters more than our nation's POLITICAL charter. If you don't like abortions, don't have one. If you don't like marriage, don't marry someone of the same sex. That's the point we need to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. The same can be said for
polygamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sounds good to me, I don't give a shit if a guy marries two women
(n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC